Page 510 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 510

CHAP TER 1 5. 1       Modelling and assembly of the full vehicle


                                                  LUMPED MASS MODEL – 100 km/h LANE CHANGE
                                       40.0

                                       30.0                    __  __  __  __

                                                      Track test
                                                               ___________
                                       20.0           ADAMS
                                    Yaw rate (deg/s)   10.0
                                       10.0
                                        0.0


                                       20.0
                                       30.0
                                       40.0
                                                     1.0                3.0                 5.0
                                           0.0                2.0                 4.0
                                                                  Time (s)
               Fig. 15.1-53 Yaw rate comparison – lumped mass model and test. (This material has been reproduced from the Proceedings of the
               Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K2 Vol. 214 ‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 4: handling simulation’, M.V.
               Blundell, page 80, by permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers.)

               in a vehicle may involve the use of a simulation method  (iii) a co-simulation involving parallel operation of the
               that involves:                                         multibody systems and control simulation software
                (i) theuseof multibodysystems softwarewhere theuser  In this example the author has chosen the second of the
                                                                                        2
                  must invest in the modelling of the control systems  above options and a vehicle model (Fig. 15.1-62) is de-
               (ii) the use of software such as MATLAB/Simulink   veloped from first principles and implemented in Simu-
                  where the user must invest in the implementation  link. The model developed here is based on the same data
                  of a vehicle model or                           used for this case study with 3 degrees of freedom: the


                                                   SWING ARM MODEL – 100 km/h LANE CHANGE
                                        40.0
                                        30.0         Track test  __  __  __  __
                                                     ADAMS    ___________
                                        20.0
                                     Yaw rate (deg/s)  10.0
                                         0.0

                                        10.0
                                        20.0
                                        30.0
                                        40.0
                                                     1.0                3.0                5.0
                                            0.0                2.0               4.0
                                                                  Time (s)
               Fig. 15.1-54 Yaw rate comparison – swing arm model and test. (This material has been reproduced from the Proceedings of the
               Institution of Mechanical Engineers, K2 Vol. 214 ‘The modelling and simulation of vehicle handling. Part 4: handling simulation’, M.V.
               Blundell, page 80, by permission of the Council of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers.)


               2  In their 2003 work, Wenzel and co-workers describe preliminary work undertaken in a collaborative research project with Jaguar Cars Ltd,
               Coventry, UK and funded by the Control Theory and Applications Centre, Coventry University, Coventry, UK. It forms the PhD programme for
               Thomas A. Wenzel.


                    518
   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515