Page 336 - Biodegradable Polyesters
P. 336

314  12  Biodegradable Polyesters Polymer–Polymer Composites

                    12.6.2
                    Mechanical Properties of PLA/PGA Nano-/Microfibrillar Polymer–Polymer Nanofibrillar
                    Composites

                    The PLLA/PGA MFCs’ properties were compared with those of neat PLLA
                    and the PLLA/PGA blends from which the MFCs were derived, as shown in
                    Table 12.4. Young’s moduli of PLLA/PGA (80/20 by wt%) and PLLA/PGA (70/30
                    by wt%) are 5% and 16% higher than that of neat PLLA but these blends are very
                    brittle, both with mean strain at break of 2.2%. The MFCs, PLLA/PGA MFC
                    (80/20 by wt%) and PLLA/PGA MFC (70/30 by wt%) exhibited Young’s moduli
                    15% and 36% higher than that of neat PLLA – clearly showing the enhancement
                    of stiffness brought about by fibrillizing the PGA, despite poor fibrillization
                    in PLLA/PGA MFC (80/20 by wt%). The toughness improvement from fibril-
                    lization is clear:The mean breaking strains of PLLA/PGA MFC (80/20 by wt%)
                    and PLLA/PGA MFC (70/30 by wt%) were 15.3% and 13.7%, respectively – a
                    huge improvement over the simple blends. PLLA/PGA MFC (70/30 by wt%)
                    exhibits significant strength improvement too, with a strength of 88.1 MPa:
                    84% and 69% higher than those of neat PLLA and PLLA/PGA (70/30 by wt%),
                    respectively. The lack of strength improvement in the case of PLLA/PGA MFC
                    (80/20 by wt%) can be attributed to poor fibrillization as observed by SEM
                    (Figure 12.10f).
                    12.6.3
                    Viscoelastic Behavior of PLLA/PGA Nano-/Microfibrillar Polymer–Polymer Composites

                    From Figure 12.11, it is clear that both MFCs relax quicker than neat PLLA – from
                    an initial stress of 20 MPa their stresses all reduced to 10–11 MPa, while the

                    Table 12.4 Tensile strengths, Young’s moduli, and strains at break of PLLA, PLLA/PGA
                    blends, and their corresponding MFCs [47].

                    Material        Young’s  Improvement  Tensile  Improvement  Strain at
                                    modulus  versus neat  strength  versus neat  break (%)
                                    (GPa)    PLLA (%)    (MPa)    PLLA (%)

                    PLLA           3.00 ± 0.06   —       48.0 ± 3.8  —        12.6 a)
                    PLLA/PGA       3.16 ± 0.07   5       51.5 ± 1.6   7       2.2 ± 0.2
                    (80/20 by wt%)
                    PLLA/PGA       3.47 ± 0.11   16      52.0 ± 1.8   8       2.2 ± 0.3
                    (70/30 by wt%)
                    PLLA/PGA MFC   3.44 ± 0.14   15      52.5 ± 0.6   9      15.3 ± 1.1
                    (80/20 by wt%)
                    PLLA/PGA MFC   4.08 ± 0.14   36      88.1 ± 6.8  84      13.7 ± 1.2
                    (70/30 by wt%)

                    a) Strain at break of the one PLLA specimen which failed within the gauge length, others failed at
                       or near the grips.
   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341