Page 130 - Computational Modeling in Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics
P. 130

Electrical activity of the heart  119


                   (GTF) to estimate CAP out of brachial or radial pressure waveform (Yao et al., 2018).
                   Moreover, the need for a rigid structure in the vicinity of the artery, which may promote
                   uniform compression and occlusion of the vessel, recommends the selection of an artery
                   close to the body surface, for example, the radial or the brachial arteries (Stergiou et al.,
                   2006; Lee and Nam, 2009; OMRON, 2020). The GTF implements a low-pass filter
                   that cuts off the high harmonics of the pressure waveform traveling from central aorta to
                   the periphery, and it can provide not only quantitative CAP but also CAP waveform
                   (Chen et al., 1997; Lee and Nam, 2009). GTF is implemented in the first device accepted
                   by US Food and Drug Administration for the estimation of CAP (Pauca et al., 2001),
                   and it is the most widely used method so far (Yao et al., 2018). On the other hand, GTF
                   was questioned in chronic kidney disease or arterial stiffness, and not all algorithms that
                   implementGTFshavethe same accuracy (Hope et al., 2003; Yao et al., 2018).
                      For adults from midlife onward, systolic CAP can be calculated via a regression
                   equation using the second systolic peak as an independent variable because the RPW
                   peak in the periphery approximates the central SBP—the pressure gradients in the
                   arterial system are relatively small during late systole, and the late systolic shoulder
                   represents the major peak for them (Pauca et al., 2001; OMRON, 2020). Other GTF
                   specialized methods for CAP estimation are available (Yao et al., 2018): N-point mov-
                   ing average, NPMA (a first-order low-pass filter that removes the pressure wave reflec-
                   tions, providing only the central aortic SBP); adaptive transfer function (for tuning the
                   GTF), individualized transfer function (ITF; uses an individualized physical transmis-
                   sion line for the aorta-brachial and aorta-radial model), blind system identification, BSI
                   (reconstructs the input out of two or more outputs). Whatever method is used, the
                   tonometry waveforms in carotid artery are calibrated to brachial SBP and DBP.
                      Applanation tonometry (AT), an oscillometric method, was introduced in ophthal-
                   mology to assess the pressure exerted by intraocular fluids on the cornea (Applanation
                   Tonometry, 2020). Eventually the tonometric estimation was used to measure the pulse
                   wave of a superficial artery noninvasively too (Kelly et al., 1989) and it evolved into the
                   arterial applanation tonometry (AAT) (Pressman and Newgard, 1963). While the sphyg-
                   momanometer measures only AP and DP, the AAT provides continuous pulse wave-
                   form with pressure sensor placed over a superficial artery. AAT is use to diagnose
                   atherosclerosis and the factors that can cause myocardial infarction, and it is aimed to
                   estimate BCP (Kips et al., 2011; Cheng et al., 2013; Zayat et al., 2017) and solve for the
                   disagreement between CAP and PBP that was evidenced to augment with the posology
                   of vasoactive agents (Mackenzie et al., 2009).



                   The augmentation index
                   The AAT pressure readout is not identical to the invasively measured one, and the
                   pressure applied to flatten the arterial wall and compress overlying tissues must be
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135