Page 209 - Defrosting for Air Source Heat Pump
P. 209

The influence of refrigerant distribution on defrosting           203


            Table 7.2 Defrosting efficiency calculations in the two cases
            Item   Parameter                             Case 1   Case 2   Unit

            1      The power input to compressor         111.2    104.7    kJ
            2      The power input to indoor air fan     7.6      5.1      kJ
            3      The energy from indoor air            648.9    576.3    kJ
            4      The power input to outdoor air fan    0        0        kJ
            5      Total energy supply for defrosting    767.7    686.1    kJ
            6      Energy consumption on melting frost   317      315.3    kJ
            7      Energy consumption on vaporizing the retained  26.9  39.1  kJ
                   water
            8      Total energy consumption during defrosting  343.9  354.4  kJ
            9      Defrosting efficiency                 44.8%    51.7%    –



           during an entire defrosting operation. In this section, the defrosting efficiencies cal-
           culated for the two cases were 44.8% and 51.7%, as listed in Table 7.2. Therefore, the
           negative effects of uneven distribution of refrigerant due to gravity and tube internal
           resistance on defrosting performance for vertically installed multicircuit outdoor coil
           were further demonstrated.
              Durations, defrosting efficiencies, and relative differences between the two cases
           are listed in Table 7.3. In this table, the duration of the tube surface temperatures at the
           exits of the three refrigerant circuits in the outdoor coil all reached 24°C. And the dif-
           ference values are percentages, which are the ratios of the difference of Cases 1 and 2
           to the value of Case 1. It is obvious that the difference of defrosting efficiencies in
           the two cases, 6.9%, is nearly the same as the difference of defrosting durations,
           7.0%. Moreover, the duration difference of refrigerant volumetric flow rate reached
           its peak value in the two cases, 8.8%, approximates the difference of defrosting




            Table 7.3 Duration, defrosting efficiency, and relative difference
            Item   Parameter                       Case 1    Case 2   Difference
            1      Defrosting duration             185 s     172 s    7.0%
            2      Duration of all fin surface temperatures  217 s  182 s  16.1%
                   reaching 24°C
            3      Duration of refrigerant volumetric flow  171 s  156 s  8.8%
                   rate reaching its peak value
            4      Duration of melted frost reaching the  140 s  120 s  14.3%
                   water-collecting Cylinder C
            5      Total energy supply for defrosting  767.7 kJ  686.1 kJ  10.6%
            6      Total energy consumption during  343.9 kJ  354.4 kJ   3.1%
                   defrosting
            7      Defrosting efficiency           44.8%     51.7%    6.9%
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214