Page 210 - Defrosting for Air Source Heat Pump
P. 210

204                                         Defrosting for Air Source Heat Pump

         efficiencies, too. However, the other durations’ differences are much bigger than the
         previous three differences, such as the duration of all fin surface temperatures
         reaching 24°C, the duration of the melted frost reached the water-collecting Cylinder
         C, and the total energy supply for defrosting. Therefore, it could be speculated that the
         defrosting duration and the duration of refrigerant volumetric flow rate reaching its
         peak value could be used to compare the defrosting performances of different system
         defrosting efficiencies. However, total energy consumption during defrosting could
         not be used as a parameter to evaluate the system defrosting performance because
         its difference value is  3.1%.
            In this section, the following conclusions could be reached. (1) An increase of 6.9%
         in defrosting efficiency if the refrigerant is evenly distributed into the three circuits
         was reported, as compared to the situation when all the stop valves were fully open.
         (2) The negative effects of uneven refrigerant distribution on system defrosting per-
         formance could be eliminated by adjusting the opening degrees of the stop valves, and
         thus the refrigerant flow into each circuit. (3) Besides the tube internal resistance, the
         refrigerant distribution should also be impacted by gravity. For an ASHP unit with a
         vertically installed multicircuit outdoor coil, the gravity impacts refrigerant distribu-
         tion, and thus on system defrosting performance might be eliminated and compara-
         tively studied by changing its placement method into horizontally installed. (4) To
         improve the defrosting efficiency for an ASHP unit with a multicircuit outdoor coil,
         the best refrigerant distribution plan may be not an even refrigerant distribution for
         each circuit, but distributing the refrigerant as the frost accumulates on each circuit.
         It means that more refrigerant should be distributed into the circuit on which frost
         accumulation is more.


         7.3   The effect investigation of uneven refrigerant
               distribution and melted frost on uneven defrosting


         Multiple parallel refrigerant circuits become commonly used for minimized pressure
         loss of flowing refrigerant and enhanced heat transfer efficiency for the refrigerant
         side of an outdoor coil used in an ASHP unit. For an ASHP unit having a vertically
         installed multicircuit outdoor coil, the phenomenon of uneven defrosting was widely
         found and reported. As indicated, the melted frost downward flowing (MFDF) due to
         gravity along the outdoor coil surface would have negative effects on system
         defrosting efficiency by prolonging the defrosting duration and increasing the energy
         consumption. To shorten the flowing path of melted frost, changing the vertically
         installed multicircuit outdoor coil into horizontally installed was carried out, indicat-
         ing that the uneven defrosting phenomenon was avoided while the defrosting
         efficiency was improved. Furthermore, after the outdoor coil was horizontally
         installed, the residual water left on its downside surface due to surface tension also
         has negative effects on system defrosting performance.
            For a multicircuit outdoor coil in an ASHP unit, an uneven frosting phenomenon
         was found, and the FEC was also defined. By adjusting the refrigerant mass flow rate
         into each circuit, experimental studies on even frosting performance of an ASHP unit
   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215