Page 250 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 250

Failure Analysis Case Studies II
                  D.R.H.  Jones (Editor)
                  0 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.  All rights reserved                       235






                         MALFUNCTIONS  OF  A  STEAM  TURBINE  MECHANICAL
                                             CONTROL  SYSTEM


                                       J. H. BULLOCH* and A. G. CALLAGY
                                  Power Generation, ESB., Lower Fitzwilliam Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
                                               (Received 13 October 1997)

                      Abstract--This  paper is aimed at elucidating the cause of a series of malfunctions involving the bending or
                      breaking of main steam turbine throttle valve spindles which occurred at service times ranging from hundreds
                      to several thousand hours in a number of 270 MW steam raising units. It was clearly established, by two distinct
                      approaches (one engineering, one micromechanistic) that the stresses which produced these malfunctions were
                      bending in nature  and were the result of  out-of-alignment deflections. In the case of the bent  spindles the
                      stresses were very high and approached  flow strength levels of around 8000 MPa while the broken spindles
                      were the results of fatigue initiation and subsequent growth from a thread root (stress concentration) location
                      on the spindle. Using relevant fatigue crack propagation  data for the valve spindle material at 300°C it was
                      demonstrated that fatigue failures occurred at spindle deflections of between 0.9 and 1.6 mm. Finally, it was
                      demonstrated that the fatigue breakage problem could be significantly reduced, especially at the lower end of
                      the valve spindle deflection range, by a combination of re-profiling the thread root and shot peening. 0 1998
                      Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
                      Keywords: Fatigue, fatigue crack growth, fatigue markings, plastic deformation, power-plant failures


                                               1.  INTRODUCTION

                  During the past decade or so certain ESB stations that operate 270 MW units have encountered
                  operational problems involving main steam turbine throttle valve spindles. Basically the problems
                  were identified as:
                  (i)  valve sticking as a direct result of spindle undergoing permanent plastic deformation or bending;
                     or
                  (ii)  spindle fracturing during operation near the top of the valve spindle in the threaded section.
                  The present study considered four separate spindle failures which occurred over a three year period
                  and involved:
                  (i)  a detailed failure analysis or micromechanic assessment; and
                  (ii)  a basic engineering stress analysis approach.


                                       2  MECHANICAL  CONSIDERATIONS

                   A detailed view uf the valve spindle arrangement is shown in Fig. 1 and in this instance the valve
                  was in the closed position. All failures occurred at position A at the root of a spindle thread while
                  the spindle bending problem was observed at position B. At these positions the working temperature
                  was assessed at about 300°C. Also, the forces acting on the valve spindle are illustrated in Fig.  1
                  between piston C and the actuating lever where the vertical force is the result of steam pressure and
                  the angular force was caused by the angle of the actuating or lifting lever. The resultant force is a
                  sideways bending force on the valve spindle and it was calculated that the relationship between the
                  bending stress uB, and value of spindle deflection 1, at position A could be expressed as follows:
                                                  ~g = 342(%),                            (1)


                   a Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
                  Reprinted from Engineering Failure Analysis 5 (3), 235-240 (1998)
   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255