Page 325 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 325

1656_C007.fm  Page 305  Monday, May 23, 2005  5:54 PM





                       Fracture Toughness Testing of Metals                                        305


                       Each of the various fracture testing standards contains restrictions on fatigue loads, which are
                       designed to satisfy the above requirements. The precise guidelines depend on the nature of the test.
                       In K  tests, for example, the maximum K during fatigue loading must be no greater than a particular
                          Ic
                       fraction of K . In J and CTOD tests, where the test specimen is typically fully plastic at failure,
                                 Ic
                       the maximum fatigue load is defined as a fraction of the load at ligament yielding. Of course one
                       can always perform fatigue precracking well below the allowable loads in order to gain additional
                       assurance of the validity of the results, but the time required to produce the crack (i.e., the number
                       of cycles) increases rapidly with decreasing fatigue loads.

                       7.1.4 INSTRUMENTATION
                       At a minimum, the applied load and a characteristic displacement on the specimen must be measured
                       during a fracture toughness test. Additional instrumentation is applied to some specimens in order
                       to monitor the crack growth or to measure more than one displacement.
                          Measuring load during a conventional fracture toughness test is relatively straightforward, since
                       nearly all test machines are equipped with load cells. The most common displacement transducer
                       in fracture mechanics tests is the clip gage, which is illustrated in Figure 7.8. The clip gage, which
                       attaches to the mouth of the crack, consists of four resistance-strain gages bonded to a pair of
                       cantilever beams. Deflection of the beams results in a change in voltage across the strain gages,
                       which varies linearly with displacement. A clip gage must be attached to sharp knife edges in order
                       to ensure that the ends of each beam are free to rotate. The knife edges can either be machined
                       into the specimen or attached to the specimen at the crack mouth.
                          A linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) provides an alternative means for inferring
                       displacements in fracture toughness tests. Figure 7.9 schematically illustrates the underlying prin-
                       ciple of an LVDT. A steel rod is placed inside a hollow cylinder that contains a pair of tightly
                       wound coils of wire. When a current passes through the first coil, the core becomes magnetized
                       and induces a voltage in the second core. When the rod moves, the voltage drop in the second coil
                       changes; the change in voltage varies linearly with displacement of the rod. The LVDT is useful
                       for measuring displacements on a test specimen at locations other than the crack mouth.
                          The potential drop technique utilizes a voltage change to infer the crack growth, as illustrated
                       in Figure 7.10. If a constant current passes through the uncracked ligament of a test specimen, the
                       voltage must increase as the crack grows because the electrical resistance increases and the net



























                       FIGURE 7.8.  Measurement of the crack-mouth-opening displacement with a clip gage.
   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330