Page 129 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 129

128                                                             Chapter 5


























             Fig. 5-6. GIS operations to measure area  and areal proportions of lithologic  units in stream
             sediment sample catchment basins. Map of sample catchment basins and map of a lithologic unit
             are crossed (i.e., intersect operation), resulting in a cross table, which records the area, as number
             of pixels (Npix), of a lithologic unit (rxph) in individual sample catchment basins (cb). Values
             in the column Npix of the cross table are appended, via table join operation, to a new column
             (npixph) in the attribute table of the stream sediment geochemical data. Areal proportions of that
             lithologic unit (in column prph) in individual sample catchment basins are obtained by dividing
             the values in column npixph by the values in column cbpix (areas, as number of pixels, of
             sample catchment basins).


             Strahler (1957)) at sample sites is a useful surrogate  for total catchment area of
             individual sample sites (Carranza,  2004a). Determining  order  of stream can  be
             performed automatically in a GIS (e.g., Garbrecht and Martz, 1997).

             Analysis and classification of geochemical anomalies
                The GIS-aided techniques for application of EDA and fractal analysis, as explained
             in Chapters 3 and 4, respectively, can be applied to the analysis and classification of
             geochemical anomalies based on dilution-corrected uni-element residuals. Such methods
             will be demonstrated further in the case study below.

             CASE STUDY

                This case study demonstrates further catchment basin analysis of stream sediment
             anomalies by using the data in the Aroroy district (Philippines). Details of the geology,
             mineralisation and stream sediment geochemical data of the case study area are given in
             Chapter 3. The catchment basins of the stream sediment samples are shown in Fig. 4-11.
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134