Page 406 - Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling and Reuse
P. 406

378   Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Recycling, and Reuse


          reuse possible. Membranes have been used more recently in suspended
          growth reactors for wastewater treatment (Sarin, 2013). The membrane bio-
          reactor (MBR) is the latest technology for biological degradation of soluble
          organic impurities. MBR technology has been in extensive usage for treat-
          ment of domestic sewage, but for industrial waste treatment applications, its
          use has been somewhat limited or selective. The MBR process is very similar
          to the conventional ASP in that both have mixed liquor solids in suspension
          in an aeration tank. The difference in the two processes lies in the method of
          separation of bio-solids. In the MBR process, the bio-solids are separated by
          means of a polymeric membrane based on a microfiltration or UF unit, as
          compared to the gravity settling process in the secondary clarifier in the con-
          ventional ASP (Mittal, 2011). Therefore, the advantages of an MBR system
          over a conventional activated sludge system are obvious:
          •  Membrane filtration provides a positive barrier to suspended bio-solids
             so that they cannot escape the system, unlike gravity settling in the
             ASP, where the bio-solids continuously escape the system along with
             clarified effluent. Sometimes a total loss of solids is also encountered
             due to process upsets causing sludge-bulking in the clarifier. As a result,
             the bio-solid concentration measured as MLSS/MLVSS can be maintained
             at three to four times greater in an MBR process ( 10,000 mg/L) in com-
             parison to the ASP ( 2500 mg/L).
          •  Due to the above aspect of MBR, aeration tank size in the MBR system
             can be one-third to one-fourth the size of the aeration tank in an acti-
             vated sludge system. Further, instead of a gravity settling-based clarifier,
             a much more compact tank is needed to house the membrane cassettes
             in the case of submerged MBR along with skid-mounted membrane
             modules in the case of a non-submerged, external MBR system.
          •  Thus, an MBR system requires only 40–60% of the space required for an
             activated sludge system, therefore significantly reducing the construction
             work/cost and overall footprint.
          •  Due to membrane filtration (micro/UF), the treated effluent quality in
             the case of the MBR system is far superior compared to conventional
             activated sludge, so the treated effluent can be directly reused as cooling
             tower make-up or for gardening or other uses. Typical treated water
             quality from the MBR system is:
                BOD 5 <5 mg/L
                Turbidity<0.2 NTU
          The MBR system has three important parts that play an important role in
          overall performance; the development at each has been moving fast since
          1990 for its commercial usage (Frenkel, 2013).
   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411