Page 392 - Integrated Wireless Propagation Models
P. 392

370    C h a p t e r   S i x


               The RSSI at Point 13 is

                       Transmitter power (0 dBm) - L  = 0 dBm - 111.73 dB  = -111.73 dBm

                  Follow the same calculations to find the, predicted RSSis of all the 15 sample
               points-interbuilding, four points; interfloor, six points; and throughout from building,
               five points-from the Lee in-building model. Since from Sec. 5.6.2.3 we have seen the
               performance of the Lee in-building model is matched better with the measured data
               than that of the ray-tracing model and FDTD model, here we just give the readers a
               picture by calculating the RSSI values of 15 sample points from both the 3D ray-tracing
               and the FDTD models using the same virtual environment.
                  Because there are no measured data available from this virtual environment,
               Fig. 6.4.2.2 compares the RSSI from both the 3D ray-tracing and FDTD models with
               that from the Lee in-building model. The RSSI values of the 3D ray-tracing model
               are closed to that of the Lee model, but the RSSI values of the FDTD model are far­
               ther apart from that of the Lee model. These findings are agreeable with the results
               shown in Fig. 5.6.2.3.1, which is backed up by the measured data.


               6.4.3  Microceii-Point-by-Point Analysis for the Lee  i crocell Model
                                                                 M
               As specified earlier, 15 points were identified to do the point-by-point analysis of the Lee
               microcell model. Two sample points, 10 and 15 are selected from Fig. 6.4.2.1(b) and




                       Data points of 3D ray,
                   FDTD and Lee model of pico case        CDFs of 3D ray and FDTD to Lee model
            -1 05                                     100
                                                       90                   _l_
            -1 00
                                                       80
             -95
                                                       70
                   v
           E     v
           !eJ  -90
           .S                                          60
           :;;                                      <;'!
           :;:::                                    lL  50
           8.  -85                                  0
           "0                                       ()
           �                   *  3D  ray of inter floor
           "iii                                        40
           �  -80              -s:l  FDTD of inter floor
           0::               *  ()  Lee model of inter floor
                     *       • ·   : •  3D ray of through out from building   30
             -75   *
                       *       1"t  FDTD of through out from building
                   *     w  *   ()  Lee of through out from building   20
             -70               iiO  3D ray of inter building
                               tl  FDTD of inter building   1 0           - U  r ban canyon
                               ()  Lee of inter building                  - FDTD
             -6s L  _  _    ......�..._....::==:::c::==  ==  ==  �-__J   0
                0        5         10       1 5           0     5      10     1 5    20
                          Point number                        Difference in dB  from  Lee  model
          FtGURE 6.4.2.2  Picoceii-Lee versus FDTD and ray tracing.
   387   388   389   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397