Page 317 - Sami Franssila Introduction to Microfabrication
P. 317

296 Introduction to Microfabrication



            HF etching of Pyrex glass with polysilicon mask;  MEMS part to the IC part is preferably done by diffu-
            silver lift-off metallization;               sions because metal–silicon interfaces cannot be made
            anodic bonding.                              until fairly late in the process. Despite its name, this
                                                         approach still has some of the MEMS steps to be done
                                                         after the completion of IC processing: usually the release
            28.6 IC–MEMS INTEGRATION
                                                         of freestanding structures and maybe metallization.
                                                           The plug-up process shown in Figure 28.10 is an
            Silicon is just one possible substrate for MEMS, but
            it is the one that promises integration with electronic  SOI MEMS–IC process that consists of the following
            (e.g., CMOS circuitry) and optical (e.g., photodiodes)  main modules:
            functions that can be fabricated on the same wafer.  1. MEMS structure processing and encapsulation;
            This section discusses some general integration issues  2. CMOS process;
            encountered with IC–MEMS integration.        3. MEMS structure release.
              There are three main ways of integrating IC and
            MEMS devices on a wafer level:                 There is no topography increase in SOI MEMS
                                                         steps, and the sealed cavities do not pose problems for
             – MEMS before IC;                           subsequent CMOS processing if the CMOS and MEMS
             – MEMS and CMOS interleaved;                parts are side by side on a wafer.
             – MEMS post processing.                       Interleaved fabrication offers the greatest challenges
                                                         for process and device designers because there are
              All of these have their strengths and weaknesses, but  so many trade-offs to be made. Take polysilicon, for
            in all cases, process complexity increases and cases of  instance: CMOS gate polysilicon is typically 0.25 µm
            successful commercialization of monolithic integration  thick, whereas micromechanical poly is ca. 2 µm thick.
            remain few. Hybrid integration at chip level is still the  Gate poly is optimized for poly/SiO 2 interface properties
            norm in the industry: MEMS chip and the accompanying  and it is highly doped. Micromechanical poly is designed
            ASIC (for readout, calibration and self-testing) are  for minimal stresses and stress gradients. If two separate
            separate chips. This is partly a commercial (production  polysilicon depositions are needed, with two different
            volume) issue, and partly a technical issue: very few  doping/annealing steps, the benefits from integration
            advanced IC fabs are capable of MEMS processing.  start disappearing.
              IC packaging is generic and simple: both plastic and  Post-processing of MEMS devices (Table 28.5)
            hermetic packages are independent of chip design and  includes a great number of choices: micromechanical
            technology. With MEMS, it is a wholly different story:  structures can be made by both subtractive (etching)
            movable structures may stick during the anodic bonding  techniques and additive (deposition) techniques.
            process, even though sticking might have been avoided
            in release etching. Wafer dicing relies on 20 000 rpm saw  Table 28.5 MEMS post-processing
            blades that might bring MEMS structures to resonance,
            water cooling may lead to sticking and silicon dust may  Subtractive       Notes
            block cavities and gaps.
              Zero-level package is a structure that seals the MEMS  Bulk silicon backside  Wet or DRIE, double-side
                                                          etching                lithography
            part from the ambience. It is preferably applied on the
                                                         Bulk silicon front side  Single sided, wet or
            whole wafer, in a manner not unlike passivation nitride
                                                          etching                plasma
            deposition in IC industry. Two routes have been explored:
                                                         Surface; front-side   Thin-film mechanical
            deposition and wafer bonding (see Figure 17.2). The  etching         elements only
            former should have zero step coverage for optimum  SOI front/back etching  Buried oxide etch stop for
            performance, acting as a roof only. The latter has the               both, wet or DRIE
            disadvantage that an additional wafer is required.
              In the MEMS-first approach, MEMS devices are pro-  Additive               Notes
            cessed and covered (e.g., by TEOS), and hopefully, they
            will not be adversely affected by the hundreds of pro-  Polysilicon/polySiGe  Thermal limit on poly
                                                                                 annealing
                                                          (LPCVD)
            cess steps it takes to complete the IC. IC-process tem-  Aluminium (sputtering)  Layer thicknesses limited
            peratures severely limit the selection of materials for  Nickel (electroplating)  Thick layers possible
            MEMS-first integration: silicon, polysilicon, oxide and  Nitride (PECVD)  Stress control
            nitride are really the only candidates. Connecting the
   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322