Page 123 - Mechanical design of microresonators _ modeling and applications
P. 123

0-07-145538-8_CH03_122_08/30/05



                                   Microhinges and Microcantilevers: Lumped-Parameter Modeling and Design

                              122   Chapter Three

                                                                 y




                                          w1
                                                       w2
                              x





                                             1 1         1 2
                              Figure 3.12 Top view of reversed trapezoid-root microcantilever.


                              l 1  = l 2  = l/2 and w 1  = w 2  and the corresponding properties characterizing
                              a constant rectangular cross-section microcantilever of length l, thick-
                              ness t, and width w have been obtained.
                                Example:  Compare the bending stiffness, effective mass, and resonant fre-
                                quency of the microcantilever sketched in Fig. 3.11 to the similar lumped-
                                parameter amounts of the reversed microcantilever of Fig. 3.12.
                                  The bending stiffness of this microcantilever is calculated by applying the
                                series connection rule given in Eq. (3.22). The direct linear bending stiffness
                                of the constant-cross-section segment located at  the free  end  is given in
                                Eq. (2.61), and the corresponding compliance is its algebraic inverse. The
                                bending compliances (direct linear, direct rotary, and cross) of the root trape-
                                zoid segment are expressed in Eqs. (3.4) through (3.6), where w 2  has to be
                                used instead of w 1  (and vice versa), and l 1  instead of l. The following bending
                                ratio can be formulated:

                                                             rev
                                                            k b,e
                                                      rk =                                (3.49)
                                                        b   k b,e
                                where the superscript “rev” (for reversed) indicates the bending stiffness of
                                the  microcantilever  of Fig. 3.12 and  k b,e   is the  bending stiffness of the
                                configuration shown in Fig. 3.11. The stiffness ratio of Eq. (3.49) can be ex-
                                pressed in terms of the following nondimensional parameters:
                                                       w 2        l 2
                                                  c =        c =                          (3.50)
                                                   w   w      l   l
                                                         1        1
                                  This ratio is plotted in Fig. 3.13 which indicates that the configuration of
                                Fig.  3.12 can  be  approximately 6 times stiffer in bending than  that of
                                Fig. 3.11. A similar comparison can be made in terms of the effective mass
                                corresponding to bending. The mass ratio




                           Downloaded from Digital Engineering Library @ McGraw-Hill (www.digitalengineeringlibrary.com)
                                      Copyright © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies. All rights reserved.
                                        Any use is subject to the Terms of Use as given at the website.
   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128