Page 265 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 265

Anions stabilized by adjacent carbonyl groups  (44) usually give racemiza-
                tion no matter what the solvent. The charge is distributed between carbon and
                oxygen; the hard proton acid prefers the hard end of the ambident base and adds
                to the 0~ygen.l~~ An  en01 results, and it lasts long enough  before  changing to
                the more  stable keto form for its environment to become symmetric.134 Cyclo-
                propyl  and vinyl  anions,  for  example 48  and  49,  have  a  greater  tendency  to
                maintain  their  configuration  than  do  ions  without  these  special  structural
                features.135











                     Reprotonation is, of course, not  the only possible fate 'of carbanions. The
                variety of their reactions makes them highly useful intermediates in synthesis.13"


                Carbon Leaving Groups
                A  number  of  reactions  of  the  general  type  shown  in  Equation  5.26  lead  to
                carbanions  by  loss  of  a  carbon  group.  These  processes  occur  when  R: -  is  a
                stabilized  carbanion; they can also be considered as the  reverse of  nucleophilic
                additions to carbonyl  (Chapter 8).
                     Cram and co-workers have investigated these reactions with ketone leaving
                groups (R,,  R,  = alkyl or aryl) and find that, as with the deprotonation route,







                the stereochemical consequences depend on the conditions.  In a relatively non-
                polar and weakly basic solvent such as  t-butyl  alcohol, the metal  ion is  closely
                associated with  the  leaving  group  and  with  a  solvent molecule  and  guides  a
                proton  donor to the side from which  the leaving group departed. The result is
                retention  (Scheme 8)  .I3'  In better-ionizing  solvents, the ion pairs can dissociate,


                133 (a) M. Eigen, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 3, 1 (1964); (b) R. G. Pearson, Survey Prog. Chem., 5, 1 (1969);
                see Section 3.5  for discussion of  the hard-soft  principle.
                134 D. J. Cram,  B.  Rickborn,  C.  A.  Kingsbury,  and  P.  Haberfield,  J. Amer.  Chem. SOC., 83,  3678
                (1961).
                   (a) H. M. Walborsky and J. M. Motes, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 92, 2445 (1970); (b) J. M. Motes and
                H.  M.  Walborsky,  J. Amer.  Chem. Soc.,  92,  3697 (1970); (c) H.  M.  Walborsky  and L.  M.  Turner,
                J. Amer. Chem. Soc.,  94, 2273 (1972).
                136 See, for example, (a) H.  0. House,  Modern Synthetic  Reactions, 2nd ed.,  W. A. Benjamin,  Menlo
                Park,  Calif.,  1972; (b) D.  C.  Ayres, Carbanions in  Synthesis, Oldbourne Press, London,  1966.
                137 (a) D. J. Cram, J. L.  Mateos,  F.  Hauck, A.  Langemann,  K.  R. Kopecky,  W. D.  Nielsen, and
                J. Allinger, J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 81, 5774 (1959); (b) J. N.  Roitman and D. J. Cram, J. Amr. Chem.
                SOC., 93, 2231 (1971).
   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270