Page 137 - MODELING OF ASPHALT CONCRETE
P. 137

Complex Modulus Characterization of Asphalt Concr ete      115


                       The studied mixtures were from the FHWA-ALF, MnRoad and WesTrack
                    experimental test sites. The calibrated model coefficients for the studied mixtures were
                    k  = −0.0124, k  = −0.59063, k  = 0.54011, and a = 1.395045, b = 0.464119, and g = −0.04893.
                     1          2          3
                    Both the bulk stress and octahedral shear stress had an effect on the modulus values as
                    the coefficients k and k  indicate.
                                  2    3
                       A separate verification of the model was conducted by testing a single specimen of
                    asphalt mixture with randomly varying confinement and deviatoric stress levels. The
                    difference between measured and predicted modulus values is less than a factor of 1.5
                    indicating relatively good prediction accuracy. It can be speculated that deviations
                    between predicted and measured values were caused by the damage accumulation
                    because applied stress states were in the dilative side of the phase change line most of
                    the time.

                    Stress-Dependent Stiffness Predictive Equation
                    Stiffness of asphalt mixture can be predicted using models such as the dynamic modulus
                    predictive equation (Andrei et al. 1999) and the Hirsch model (Christensen et al. 2003).
                    The advantage of these models is that they provide an approximate but useful way of
                    estimating mixture stiffness (modulus) for various design purposes. These models,
                    however, only model the modulus obtained in the linear viscoelastic region.
                    Furthermore, there are no simple models available to estimate the effect of nonlinearity
                    and confinement on HMA modulus values. Pellinen and Witczak (2002b) also
                    developed the stress-dependent stiffness predictive equation which is based on Eqs. (4-20)
                    and (4-21). Equations (4-22), (4-23), and (4-24) show the model form, and Eq. (4-25)
                    describes mix gradation (G ) as an average of the percent passing four sieve sizes of
                                            a
                    0.074 mm, 4 mm, 9.5 mm, and 19 mm (No. 200, No. 4, 3/8 in, and 3/4 in). Table 4-4
                    gives the model coefficients. The model expects a minimum bulk stress value of 21 kPa
                    and octahedral shear stress value of 9.9 kPa for unconfined linear viscoelastic stress
                    case predictions.
                                                     α − ( +δ  A ) a G+  +  a  VFA
                                     log(| |) =+δ  A +        βγ  4  a −  5 η           (4-22)
                                           ∗
                                         E
                                                              +
                                                                  f
                                                        1 +  exp  log(() c  log( )
                                           A =  a + a G +  a VFA + a log( )η            (4-23)
                                               0   1  a  2     3

                      Material Coefficients  k –k  Model Coefficients  Sigmoidal Model Coefficients
                                              1  3
                      a  = −10.429150        k  = 0.099088          a = 1.324132
                       0                      1
                      a  = 0.004106          k  = 0.0217941          b = 0.615775
                       1                      2
                      a  = −0.015376         k  = −0.011816          g = −0.584201
                       2                      3
                      a  = 0.013351
                       3
                      a  = −0.000808
                       4
                      a  = 0.001594
                       5
                       c = 0.625379
                    Source: Pellinen and Witczak 2002b, with permission from Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists.
                    TABLE 4-4  Predictive Model Coefficients
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142