Page 232 - Modular design for machine tools
P. 232

192   Engineering Design for Machine Tool Joints

                 At present, each region cannot be exactly and quantitatively deter-
               mined; however, the idea described here is considered reasonable and
               applicable to the analysis, design, and research of the joint. To define the
               region of the joint and to research the joint, thus, it is of great importance
               to grasp the magnitude of the interface pressure being acted on the joint.
               In consideration of some data already reported elsewhere, the magni-
               tudes of the interface pressure can be roughly estimated as follows.

               • For the sliding joint without local deformation: from 1 to 50 MPa
                                     2
                 (about 0.1 to 5 kgf/cm )
               • For the sliding joint with local deformation: from 50 to 250 MPa (about
                              2
                 5 to 25 kgf/cm )
                                                                               2
               • For the bolted joint: from 500 to 2000 MPa (about 50 to 200 kgf/cm )
                 Although the exact definition of joint itself has not been determined
               yet, it is, at the least, necessary to represent clearly the leading joint
               characteristics. Based on  long-standing experience, there are two rep-
               resentative expressions of the static and dynamic behavior of the struc-
               tural body component in machine tools, such as in the bolted joint in
               Fig. 5-15. The expressions for bending stiffness K SB  and torsional stiff-
               ness K ST  are suitable for the engineering design, whereas another
               expression is aimed at describing directly the joint characteristic itself.
               The joint characteristic can be defined by using, e.g., the inclination
               angle     created by the existence of the joint. This inclination angle is
               very sensitive to change in the essential features of the joint, showing
               obviously the joint characteristics, and thus the expression using the
               inclination angle is available for detailed research. Obviously, these
               two expressions can be converted to one another, as already shown in
               Fig. 5-15, provided that the flange behaves as a stiff body, resulting in
               the linear distribution of the interface pressure.
                 Admitting the validity of the conversion shown in Fig. 5-15, at issue in
               the machine tool structure is the complex loading condition, and often the
               flange is prone to show local deformation. Within an engineering design,
               the stiffnesses K and K ST  are in fact useful and applicable; however, the
                              SB
               equivalent stiffness, which is given by the column without any joints, is
               required to have the fully quantified evaluation or to carry out an absolute
               assessment. Figure 5-16 shows such a correlation together with the com-
               plex loading condition in the machine tool, for the sake of the ease of under-
               standing. In short, the joint stiffness can be evaluated by comparing, for
               instance, K SB  with K , resulting in the expression of relative stiffness.
                                  OB
                 To enhance the sophisticated knowledge, the emphasis now is on the
               flat joint, where two characteristics are at issue: one is the normal joint
               stiffness K and the other is the tangential joint stiffness K sh,  as shown
                         sn
               in Fig. 5-17. In not only flat but also bolted joints, we should furthermore
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237