Page 326 - Book Hosokawa Nanoparticle Technology Handbook
P. 326

5.4 NANOPORE CHARACTERIZATION                                                FUNDAMENTALS
                  the resultant distribution has bimodal or multimodal  H1             H2
                  distribution.
                    5.4.3.4 Underestimation of pore size in
                    single-nanometer range
                  The spread of commercial nitrogen adsorption appa-
                  ratus has made PSD measurement quite easy.  The
                  obtained PSDs, however, should not be blindly
                  accepted. The estimation of pore size based on the
                  Kelvin model as given by equations (5.4.3) and
                  (5.4.4) works well for pores larger than 10 nm. It has,  H3          H4
                  however, been pointed out from late 1980s that the
                  model underestimates the so-called single-nanometer
                  range of pores [8, 9]. However, no method with sim-
                  plicity and convenience was available in even 1990s,
                  which forced people to use the Kelvin model though
                  knowing its inaccuracy.
                    A condensation model with simple concept and
                  easy calculation has recently been proposed [10, 11],
                  which is explained briefly in the following. The point
                  is that the attractive potential energy from pore walls  Figure 5.4.5
                  and the stronger surface tension of curved interface  Classification of hysteresis given by IUPAC.
                  will enhance the condensation in nanoscale pores.
                  The basic equation is:
                                                                 general conclusion. Limiting the topic into the struc-
                                 p     2   ()
                            RT ln                 r (),  (5.4.5)  ture made up by aggregated particles or sintered
                                 p s       r ()                  porous body, however, the following understanding
                                                                 can hold.
                  in which the free energy for condensation is compen-  The characteristics of this kind of structure would
                  sated not only by the Young–Laplace effect with local  be that there must exist particles’ contacting point at
                  curvature dependent surface tension  ( ), but also by  the end of the pore space. Then the contacting points
                  the relative strength of pore wall’s attractive energy  and its vicinity are able to provide nuclei for the con-
                  compared with the liquid   (r). The latter effect can  densation, and an energy barrier as may be the case
                  be determined from standard isotherm data that are  for MCM-41 would not stand upon condensation
                  usually included in the automated adsorption appara-  process. Therefore the condensation process for this
                  tuses. Further details are given by the original papers  kind of materials follows an equilibrium path.
                  or a review [12].                              Another feature is that pores are connected through
                    The degree of the underestimation by the Kelvin  narrower spaces between particles, or the pore net-
                  model stays almost constant regardless of the pore size,  work is formed with connecting “necks”. In this case,
                  but varies depending on the pore-wall potential energy.  the desorption process itself is in equilibrium, but the
                  Some examples of difference between Kelvin-based  so-called ink-bottle effect gives hysteresis in which
                  prediction and the true pore size are: ca. 1 nm or slightly  the evaporation of condensate in a pore space is not
                  greater for carbon materials, ca. 1 nm or less for silica  possible until the pressure goes down to a value cor-
                  materials, and 0.5–0.7 nm for ordered mesoporous  responding to the size of the neck. The evaporated
                  silicates (FSM-16, MCM-41). Thus one should under-  volume at this hindered process, then, does not mean
                  stand that, if the BJH (Barell, Joyner and Halenda) [7]  the pore volume of the pore size corresponding to this
                  method gives peak pore size to be 3 nm for a silica gel,  pressure. This process exhibits H2-type of the hys-
                  the true size is about 4 nm or slightly less than 4 nm.  teresis, and the adsorption branch should be used to
                                                                 calculate the size distribution of the pore space.
                    5.4.3.5 Hysteresis                           Examples of materials include silica gels and porous
                  If an adsorption isotherm goes with capillary conden-  polymer gels. Many providers of such materials use
                  sation, the hysteresis between adsorption and desorp-  desorption branches for showing porous characteris-
                  tion processes results in most cases. The classification  tics to users because it gives sharp distribution. One
                  of the hysteresis into four types is given by IUPAC as  should note, however, that the peak in the distribution
                  shown in Fig. 5.4.5. There has been a long discussion  simply gives the neck size and the real distribution
                  on which branch to be used for pore-size determina-  would be broader in most cases.
                  tion, or which branch represents true equilibrium  Another important topic related with hysteresis
                  process, but it is still now quite difficult to obtain a  is the end-closure point of the desorption branch.

                                                                                                        301
   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331