Page 295 - Origin and Prediction of Abnormal Formation Pressures
P. 295

266                                  H.H. RIEKE, G.V. CHILINGAR AND J.O. ROBERTSON JR.

                                             I
                                                                      i
                                                                                I
                                                         !
                                             ,
                                .~
                    _
                                                                                ,
                                                                     I
                  --v ........................  . .................................................. r ......................... "f ........................ :--  I
                    !  ,  i     ~  :  ~      !   9       !          1  Na   +   t  .."  i  '
                                                                                ;'
                                             i
                                                                     .
                    :           !  :         !   9       t  .       .i-v+       i  .   4
            E:)
            CD                  :            '           I          ,k   ~_2+   i   "
                    :
            O   4    9 .: .........................   :"  : ................  "   ":  "..   "  !  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  I   ~ f J  :  :.
            O       :          -  ,  ............................................   ~  Mg  2+   ......... ~--
            p,.,.
                                                                    .  SO~ ~-
             X                                                                  i
                                                                      Cl-
                                              9    e
             13')  3    9 ~. .........................   .- .........................   .,. ....  .'. ...................   I
             IE                                                      "  TDS
             ff                                     a
             O
            . i                              i          o
            -I--.                                         .",..'.  ....................   ;  ............................
                2   ,,...:  ..........................   : .........................   .:. ..........................
                  .             ~            "
             r'
             (1)                 :  i   x   x   :  i     "
             O                   "             K
             E
             O   1  --~ ..........................   i .........................   ~ ...........  ~ ' ; ; ! 2  .......................   i .........................   ~-
            L)
                  ---i .........................   ~  ......  *  .........  *  ..... i ..... *  ....  z~..,~..$..a.~.a~.a~   ......... i. .........................   }-.--
                    i            |           |                                  t
                    1           10         1 O0        1000       1 O, 000   100,000
                                          Axial  pressure,  psi
            Fig.  10-23.  Relationship  between  the  axial  pressure  and  major  ion  concentration  in  expelled  pore water from
            a  Ca-smectite  clay  hydrated  in  seawater.  Loading  rate  was  10  psi/h  (19.15  Pa/s)  at  a  temperature  of 40~
            (Based  upon  data  from  Knill  et  al.,  1976,  table  7.2,  pp.  97.  In Chilingarian  et al.,  1994,  fig.  5-18,  p.  137.)
            sandstone,  and  also  Berger  et  al.  (1999)  laboratory  analysis  of  illitization  in the  Texas
            Gulf Coast shales.
               The  dehydration  mechanism  has  been  linked  to  the  generation  of  abnormally  high
            subsurface  pressures  found  in  Tertiary  basins  and  postulated  as  a  means  by  which
            petroleum  could  be  expelled  from  shales.  It  was  also  used  to  explain  the  anomalous
            freshwater in the upper parts of geopressured zones. Powers (1959) proposed a two-stage
            water-escape  dehydration  model,  which  was  modified  by  Burst  (1969)  to  include
            thermal dehydration and a third stage as shown in Fig.  10-28. Burst's  three-stage system
            considers  the  initial  water flow  to consist  of interstitial  pore  water and  water from clay
            interlayers  (more  than  two)  after  a  few  thousand  feet  of  burial,  where  the  water  is
            being  removed  as  a  result  of  overburden  pressure.  A  second  stage  is  thought  to  occur
            when  the  heat  absorbed  by  the  buried  sediment  becomes  sufficient  to  mobilize  the
            next-to-last water interlayer.  Fertl  (1976)  pointed  out  that  the  first  and  last  dehydration
            stages  are  probably  unimportant  in  Gulf  Coast  oil  migration,  because  they  occur  at
            levels  either  too  shallow  or  too  deep  to  intersect  the  interval  of  maximum  liquid
            petroleum  availability.  The  mobile,  freed  water  during  the  second  stage  intersects  the
            maximum  liquid  petroleum  interval.  The  amount  of  water  is  calculated  to  be  10-
            15%  of  the  compacted  bulk  shale  volume  and  could  account  for  redistribution  of  the
   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300