Page 294 - Performance Leadership
P. 294

Notes • 283


            16. Argyris, C.; Schon, D. (1978), Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action
               Perspective, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

            17. Tiggelaar, B. (2006), Dromen, Durven, Doen (in Dutch), Spectrum,
               Utrecht.

            Chapter 3

             1. Marr, B. (2006), Strategic Performance Management, Leveraging and
               Measuring Your Intangible Value Drivers, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
             2. Robbins, S.R. (1993), Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall, Englewood
               Cliffs.
             3. Academics do not agree on the validity of the Hawthorne effect. However,
               the Hawthorne principle is taught in every university and business school as
               an important principle in the social sciences, and teaches an important
               lesson. The Hawthorne effect describes “an experimental effect in the
               direction expected but not for the reason expected; i.e., a significant positive
               effect that turns out to have no causal basis in the theoretical motivation for
               the intervention, but is apparently due to the effect on the participants of
               knowing themselves to be studied in connection with the outcomes measured.”
               See http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/hawth.html#Hawthorne%20overall.
             4. Ridgway, V.F. (1956), “Dysfunctional Consequences of Performance
               Measurement,” Administative Science Quarterly.
             5. Bititci, U., et al. (2004), “The Interplay Between Performance
               Measurement,  Organizational Culture and Management Styles,”
               Performance Measurement and Management: Public and Private,
               Performance Measurement Association, Edinburgh.

             6. Ridgway, V.F. (1956).
             7. Smith, M. (1995, Vol.18 No. 2/3),” On the Unintended Consequences of
               Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector,” International Journal
               of Public Administration.; Jackson, A. (2005, Vol.31 No. 1), “Falling from a
               Great Height: Principles of Good Practice in Performance Measurement
               and the Perils of Top Down Determination of Performance Indicators,”
               Local Government Studies; Radnor, Z.J. (2005), “Developing a Typology of
               Organisational Gaming,” European Group of Public Administration
               (EGPA) Conference, Bern, Switzerland.
             8. Waal, A.A. de (2001), Power of Performance Management: How Leading
               Companies Create Sustained Value, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
             9. Buytendijk, F.A.; Slaghuis-Brinkhuis, J. (2000), Balanced Scorecard: Van
               Meten Naar Managen (in Dutch), Wolters-Kluwer, Amsterdam.
   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299