Page 298 - Performance Leadership
P. 298

Notes • 287


               Schaltegger, S.; Wagner, M. (2002), “The Sustainability Balanced
               Scorecard—Theory and Application of a Tool for Value-Based
               Sustainability Management,” Greening of Industry Network Conference
               on Corporate Social Responsibility—Governance for Sustainability,
               Gothenburg.

            15. Fortune (Nov. 2007), “The 2007 Accountability Ranking.”
            16. Manager Magazin (2007, 2), Good Company Ranking, Germany.
            17. Prahalad, C.K.; Hamel, G. (1994), Competing for the Future, Harvard
               Business Press, Boston.
            18. Zadek, S. (November 12, 2007), “Inconvenient but True: Good Isn’t
               Always Profitable, Fortune.
            19. January 29, 2003, press release, “Europe’s Largest Pension Fund Buys a
               Minority Stake in SRI Research Firm,” available at http://www
               .socialfunds.com/news/article.cgi/1020.html.
            20. Bissacco, I.; Spinelli, C.; Maccarrone, P. (2006), “The Measurement of the
               Degree of Corporate Social Responsibility of a Firm,” Performance
               Measurement and Management: Public and Private.
            21. Global Reporting Initiative (2002), “Sustainability Reporting Guidelines,”
               available at www.globalreporting.org.

            22. Author interview with Jani Rautiainen, manager, corporate reporting
               systems (October 2007); also, Metso’s “Sustainability Report” (2006),
               available at www.metso.com.
            23. Rabobank (2005), “Annual Sustainability Report,” available at
               www.rabobankgroup.com, Netherlands.
            Chapter 11
             1. Mintzberg, H. (1983), Power in and Around Organizations, Prentice-Hall,
               Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
             2. Smith, M.; Heady, R.B.; Carson (Phillips), P.; Carson, K.D. (2001, 6), “Do
               Missions Accomplish Their Mission? An Exploratory Analysis of Mission
               Statements and Organizational Longevity,” Journal of Applied Management
               and Entrepreneurship.
             3. www.bain.com.
             4. Ahn, H. (2004), “Developing Individualized Balanced Scorecards: Status
               Quo and MCDM Approach,” Performance Measurement and Management:
               Public and Private, Performance Measurement Association, Edinburgh.

             5. Bart, C.K.; Bontis, N.; Taggar, S. (2001, 39/1), “A Model of the Impact of
               Mission Statements on Firm Performance,” Management Decision.
   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303