Page 292 - Process Modelling and Simulation With Finite Element Methods
P. 292

Coupling Variables Revisited            279
         By comparison, the Subdomain settings are pedestrian:



                  Select mode gl (geoml domain  1)
                  Set r=O, da=O, F=ul+l+eps*fl
                  Apply/OK
                  Select mode g2 (geom2 domain 1) Set r=-u2xl  0, da=O, F=u2+1
                  Select mode g2 (geom2 domain 2) Set r=-u2xl  0, da=O, F=u2-f2
                  Select mode g2 (geom2 domain 3) Set r=-u2xl  0, da=O,
                  F=u2+ 1/( 1 +2 *eps/3)
                  Apply


         The horizontal diffusive  flux in our second geometry  (abstract  2-D  domain) is
         merely  a  numerical  convenience to  help  insure  stability.  Since the  model,  by
         construction, is horizontally  homogeneous in this space, with no flux BCs (see
         below),  no  amount  of  horizontal  diffusion can  alter the  solution  theoretically.
         Yet  stronger  diffusion  will  damp  out  any  horizontal  numerical  errors  which
         might  creep  in  due  to  truncation.  With  vertical  diffusion,  however,  this  is
         not true, so it is excluded. Now for the boundary conditions.  Neutral are needed.
         Pull down the Boundary menu and select Boundary Settings.





                    Mode 82: geom2 all domains  Select Neumann, G=O


         In Mesh mode, set max edge size general to 0.35 for geom2, which gives mesh
         for mode g2 (691 nodes,  1296 elements) and in mode gl, set max edge size to
         0.1, to give 251 nodes, 250 elements.  Solve.  The solution should appear as in
         Figure 7.13.
             Note  that  our  2-D  abstract  domain  gives  u2  horizontally  as  fairly
         homogeneous.   So  vertical  line  integrals  traducing  all  three  subdomains
         experience ul (x2) when integrating u2(xl,x2) along the x2 coordinate.
             Figure 7.13 (left) shows that the physically important region over which the
         temperature  gradient  moves  from  edge  value  (-1)  to  asymptotic  value  -
         1/(1+2N/3), is not more than about a dimensionless length of 2.5.  This limiting
         behavior  matches  the  theoretical  predictions  of  Shaqfeh  [18],  and  is  a
         consistency  check  on  the  kernel.  An  interesting  feature  of  this  profile  is  the
         internal  maximum of  temperature gradient.  Shaqfeh graphed the  temperature
         profile itself, so given the relatively smooth transition, the integration of g might
         have  such a modest internal maximum discernable, but here, in the gradient, it
   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297