Page 140 - Reliability and Maintainability of In service Pipelines
P. 140

Case Studies on the Application of Structural Reliability 127


           assumption of no correlation may not lead to significant difference. On the other
           hand, the theory of stochastic processes (Papoulis and Pillai, 2002) and the
           research experience (Li and Mahmoodian, 2013) suggest that the assumption of
           no autocorrelation between different time points generally leads to greater esti-
           mates of the probability of the occurrence of events, which is conservative for the
           assessment of pipeline deterioration.
             The probability of failure due to corrosion with different acceptable operating
           pressure is shown in Fig. 5.2. There is a remarkable change in the safe life of the
           pipeline  as  the  operating  pressure  increases.  For  example,  for  the
           acceptable failure probability of 0.05, the safe life increases from 15 to 25 years as
           the operating pressure decreases from 6.55 MPa to 4.85 MPa. This result can be
           used as a quantitative indicator by pipeline maintenance engineers to outline how
           and to what extent the operating pressure affects the safe life of the pipeline asset.
             To verify the results of the first passage probability method in this case study,
           Monte Carlo simulation method was also used to calculate probability of failure.
           The details of the Monte carlo simulation method were discussed in Section 4.4.
           This comparison is shown in Fig. 5.3. As can be seen, the probability of failure as
           predicted by first passage probability method is in good agreement with that
           determined by Monte Carlo simulation, in particular in the region of small proba-
           bilities. As may be appreciated, it is the region of small probabilities, i.e., lower
           risk, that is of most practical interest.
             The difference between the results of analytical and MC method can be due to
           approximations in the analytical method (specially determination of correlation
           coefficient ρ and coefficient of variation λ Q ).
                     Q


                       1
                      0.9
                      0.8
                     Probability of failure  0.6
                      0.7


                      0.5
                      0.4
                      0.3
                                                       Po = 5.7 MPa
                                                       Po = 6.55 MPa
                      0.2                              Po = 4.85 MPa
                      0.1
                       0
                         0     10  15  20  25  30   40      50     60
                                           Time (year)
           Figure 5.2 Probability of failure for different operating pressure.
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145