Page 20 - Sumatra Geology, Resources and Tectonic Evolution
P. 20

Chapter 2

                                         Seismology  and  neotectonics


                                                           JOHN  MILSOM




            Sumatra  is  an  active  (Andean)  continental margin that  would  be   described by  Sieh  &  Natawidjaja  (2000)  as  a  homocline  and  by
            linked by  land  to  SE  Asia  if sea  level  fell by  as  little  as  50 m.   Karig et  al.  (1980)  as a  'fault-flexure'.
            Present-day  tectonic  processes  are  controlled  by  three  major   Magnetic  anomalies  in  the  Indian  Ocean  south  of  Sumatra
            fault systems, the most obvious of which is the  subduction thrust   trend  east-west  and were  interpreted by Sclater &  Fisher (1974)
            which  crops  out  in  the  Sunda  Trench.  The  trench  curves  very   as  indicating  Palaeogene  ages  for  most  of  the  crust  adjacent  to
            little  in  the  800 km  between  Enggano  and  Nias,  i.e.  off  central   the  trench,  with  a  possibility  of  Late  Cretaceous  crust  in  the
            Sumatra  (Fig.  2.1),  but  is  markedly  convex  towards  the  Indian   extreme  SE.  Transforms  such  as  the  Investigator  Fracture  Zone,
            Ocean  both  further  north  and  further  south.  Water  depths  of   which  may  offset  the  anomalies  by  several  hundred  kilometres,
            more  than  6000 m  are  reached  in the  south  but  the  maximum in   run  almost  precisely  north-south.  With  the  trend  of  the  trench
            the  north  may  be  less  than  5000 m.  The  difference  is  usually,   varying from  N40~   to  N60~   and  the  direction  of the  Indian
            and convincingly, attributed to  the presence  on the Indian Ocean   Ocean-Sumatra  convergence vector being about N15~  (Fig. 2.1),
            plate  of  the  Nicobar  Fan,  consisting  of  sediments,  derived   Sumatra  has  long  been  recognized  as  a  key  area  for  studies  of
            ultimately from erosion of the Himalayas, which increase steadily   the  partitioning  of  strain  between  thrust  and  transcurrent  faults
            in thickness towards  the  north  (e.g.  Hamilton  1979).  Continuing   during oblique convergence  (Fitch  1972;  McCaffrey  1992,  1996;
            subduction  is  attested  by  a  Wadati-Benioff  Zone  (WBZ)  that   Malod  &  Kemal  1996).  The  suggestion,  originally  made  by
            extends  to  depths  of  the  order  of  200 km  (e.g.  Newcomb  &   Fitch  (1972),  that  the  oblique  motion  is  to  a  first  approxima-
            McCann  1987) and by volcanic activity in the Barisan mountains,   tion  accommodated  by  orthogonal  subduction  at  the  trench  and
            the peaks  of which  generally lie within a  few  tens  of kilometres   dextral  slip  along  the  Sumatran  Fault,  is  now  widely  accepted.
            of the  coast.  The  change,  of  more  than  45 ~  in  the  trend  of  the   To the extent that this is true, the forearc region must be decoupled
            trench  between  96~  and  97~  (the  'Nias  Elbow')  may  have   from  both  the  Indian  Ocean  and  Eurasia.  The  commonly  used
            been initiated by  subduction  of the  2 km high Investigator  Ridge   term  'sliver plate'  (e.g.  Curray  1989)  suggests  more  strength  and
            (Investigator  Fracture  Zone),  which  trends  approximately north-   rigidity  than  could  reasonably  be  expected  of  such  a  long  and
            south  at  about  98~   Sieh  &  Natawidjaja  (2000)  defined  a   narrow  strip  of  lithosphere,  and  any  analysis  of  subduction
            'Central Domain'  of mainland Sumatra between  the  Nias  Elbow   beneath  Sumatra  must  take  into  account  the  probability of inde-
            and  the  ridge  intersection  as  anomalous  in  a  number  of  ways   pendent movements of forearc  fragments (e.g.  McCaffrey  1991).
            (notably  in  the  differing  trends  of  the  Sumatran  Fault  and  the   Estimates  of  the  movements  of  the  Indian  Ocean  relative
            volcanic  line)  and  as  distinct  from  more  regular  Northern  and   to  Sumatra  are  shown in Figures  2.1  and 2.4.  Changes in magni-
            Southern domains on either side (Fig. 2.1).             tude  and  direction  from  NW  to  SE  are  dictated  by  the  East
              Inland,  the  dextral  transcurrent  Sumatran  Fault runs  the  entire   African location of the pole of rotation (Larson et al.  1997). If par-
            length  of  the  island,  from  Banda  Aceh  to  the  Sunda  Strait   titioning  of orthogonal  and  transcurrent  strain  between,  respect-
            (Fig.  2.1).  A  variety  of  names  have  been  used  for  both  the   ively,  the  trench  and  the  Sumatran  Fault  were  complete  (and
            overall  fault  system  and  parts  of  it,  and  new  nomenclature   movement  occurred  only  along  these  features),  then  sites  in  the
            developed by Sieh &  Natawidjaja (2000)  divided it into  19  indi-   forearc  sliver would move parallel to the  Sumatran Fault relative
            vidual segments.  Even  this detailed study  failed to  answer many   to  SE  Asia,  but  at  right  angles  to  the  trench  relative  to  the
            fundamental questions, and estimates of total lateral displacement   Indian  Ocean.  Trench-normal  relative  motion  implies  that  the
            still vary  from  several  hundred  kilometres  to  as  little  as  twenty   forearc  sliver  'tracks'  across  linear features  on  the  Indian Ocean
            kilometres.  The  150km  suggested  by  McCarthy  &  Elders   Plate,  such as the Investigator Fracture  Zone,  which have north-
            (1997)  seems  to  be  about  the  mean  of the published values.  The   south  trends  (Fig.  2.1).  If the  long  term  movement between  the
            fault trace  coincides roughly  with  the  watershed  of the  Barisans   forearc  and  the  Indian  Ocean  has  actually  been  approximately
            and  with  the  volcanic  line,  although  most  of  the  volcanoes  lie   orthogonal,  the  intersection  point  of  the  Investigator  Fracture
            somewhat to the NE of the fault and only nine of the fifty youngest   Zone  with  the  trench,  now  near  the  Batu  Islands,  would  have
            centres  lie within 2 km of it (Sieh &  Natawidjaja 2000).  A  more   been north  of Nias  less than  10 million years ago.  The  relief, of
            precise  correlation  is  with  the  subduction  thrust,  since  for  most   more  than  2 km,  on  the  Investigator  Fracture  Zone  might  not
            of  its  length  the  distance  between  the  Sumatran  Fault  and  the   only impede  such  tracking  but  could  be  responsible for  cyclical
            trench  axis  differs  by  no  more  than  30 km  from  the  average   uplift and subsidence in the forearc basin and ridge.
            value  of  290 km.  The  largest  deviations  are  a  narrowing  within   Slip  partitioning  and  subduction  of  Indian  Ocean  lithosphere
            the  bight  of  the  Nias  Elbow  and  a  broadening  in  the  region   produce  high  levels  of  seismicity in  the  Barisan  Mountains,  in
            further to the NW.                                      the forearc basin and along the forearc ridge (Fig. 2.2). The poten-
              The third and most enigmatic of Sumatra's major fault systems   tial  for  extremely  destructive  earthquakes  was  most  recently
            is  the  Mentawai  Fault,  at  the  outer  margin  of  the  forearc  basin   demonstrated by the Magnitude 9 event near Simeulue in Decem-
            (Fig.  2.1).  In  many  publications  the  name  is  reserved  for  the   ber 2004  and by the resulting tsunami, which gave rise to  one  of
            segment  extending  from  the  Sunda  Strait  to  Nias  (Samuel  &   the  worst  natural  disasters  in recorded  human history.  However,
            Harbury  1996)  or the Batu  Islands (Diament et  al.  1992), but the   and despite the geological evidence for a long history of subduc-
            same  disturbance  zone  continues  at  least  as  far as  the  Andaman   tion  (e.g.  Page  et  al.  1979),  shocks  deeper  than  200 km  are  rare
            Sea  (Malod  &  Kemal  1996)  and  possibly  to  the  Andaman  and   (Fig.  2.3).  Events  below  300 km  are  confined to  the  extreme  SE
            Nicobar  Islands.  Movement  has  been  variously  interpreted  as   and  may  be  associated  with  north-directed  subduction  beneath
            normal,  strike  slip  or  reverse  (Sieh  &  Natawidjaja  2000).  There   Java  rather  than  NE-directed  subduction  beneath  Sumatra.  The
            are  considerable  changes  in  appearance  on  seismic  sections   abrupt  change  in  orientation  of the  active  margin between  these
            even  within the  region  from  Nias  southwards;  the  structure  was   two  islands  must  produce  considerable  stress  in  the  downgoing
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25