Page 233 - The CNN Effect in Action - How the News Media Pushed the West toward War ini Kosovo
P. 233

1403975191ts11.qxd  19-2-07  05:10 PM  Page 198
                                                         198
                                                                 NOTES
                                                            4. The exact meaning of the Clausewitzian trinity has been a subject of
                                                               much debate over the past two centuries. It is beyond the scope of this
                                                               book to indulge in this debate. Therefore, a leading interpretation is
                                                               adopted.
                                                            5. Although the majority of the public in the United States and Western
                                                               Europe did support the NATO-led war against the FRY just before
                                                               and during the actual intervention. The Pew Research Center for The
                                                               People & The Press, “Collateral Damage Takes its Toll.” Cited in
                                                               Livingston “Media Coverage of the War,” 377.
                                                            6. Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics Amongst Nations: The Struggle for Power
                                                               and Peace, Sixth Edition (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1986),
                                                               279–281. This argument, of course, was different from arguing that
                                                               domestic public opinion is impotent within a democratic state.
                                                            7. According to Entman,
                                                                 Individuals may have real preferences, but obtaining truly compre-
                                                                 hensive data on the preferences of a majority of individuals toward
                                                                 any specific government decision at a given moment of time
                                                                 becomes, in practice, difficult if not impossible, especially for jour-
                                                                 nalists who lack the scholarly luxuries of space, qualification, and
                                                                 abstraction necessary to make credible claims about public opin-
                                                                 ion. Making claims in wider public discussion about the status of
                                                                 public opinion thus requires selecting some data on some senti-
                                                                 ments and ignoring the rest—or framing.
                                                               See Robert Entman, “Declarations of Independence: The Growth of
                                                               Media Power after the Cold War,” in  Decisionmaking in a Glass
                                                               House: Mass Media, Public Opinion, and American and European
                                                               Foreign Policy in the 21st Century, ed. Brigitte Nacos, Robert Shapiro,
                                                               and Pierangelo Isernia (Lanhan, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
                                                               Publishers, Inc, 2000), 20.
                                                            8. John R. Zaller, The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion (Cambridge:
                                                               Cambridge University Press, 1992), 28.
                                                            9. Cited in Ole R. Holsti, “Public Opinion and Foreign Policy Analysis:
                                                               Where We Were, Are, and Should Strive to Be,” in  Millennial
                                                               Reflections on International Studies, ed. Michael Brecher and Frank P.
                                                               Harvey (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002), 515.
                                                           10. Entman, “Declarations of Independence,” 19.
                                                           11. Entman points to research that showed such a divergence in the late
                                                               1970s where media claims of public opinion shifts to the right were
                                                               not bore out in actual polling data at the time that showed no such
                                                               movement. See ibid., 21.
                                                           12. Pew Research Center For The People & The Press, “Public Appetite
                                                               for Government Misjudged: Washington Leaders Wary of Public
                                                               Opinion” (April 17, 1998), via http://people-press.org/reports/
                                                               display.php3? Page ID 581. Cited in Entman, “Declarations of
                                                               Independence,” 22–23. Also, most politicians do not have the
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238