Page 176 - The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs
P. 176

-  THE  GEOLOGICAL  INTERPRETATION  OF  WELL  LOGS  -




                     LITHOLOGIC                            POROSITY  AND  FLUIDS    FORMATION
          DEPTH                         FLUID  ANALYSIS
                   CHARACTERISTICS                            BULK  VOLUME        *®BULK  VOLUME
                 SHALE  %  BULK  VOLUME   WATER  SATURATION                     CLAY    QTZ  | POROS
                 0                100]   100   %
                   PERMEABILITY  INDEX  | HYOROCARBON  VOLUME  [fe
                                             $*Shr    0.25
                                      HYDROCARBON  WEIGHT
                                            $*Sn*  Py,

                                                             (  -  )Bit  Size
                                                     permpoam  ror
                                                    -4   0           12















                                                                                                  ZONE  OF
                                                                                                 INTEREST





                                    x
                                  at
         Figure  11.22  Typical  computer  processed  interpretation  (CPI)  output.  The  lithology  is  in  volume  %  of  end  members.  The  log  is
         mainly  for  hydrocarbon  indication.  (From  Dresser  Atlas,  1982).

         and  then,  finally,  each  population  is  related  to  the  external   edited  data  are  re-scaled  and  reduced  using  principal
         grouping  of  lithology  (Anxionnaz  ef  ai.,  1990).  The   component  analysis.  For  log  data,  the  first  principal  com-
         approach  was  well  described  by  Serra  and  Abbott  (1980)   ponent  axis  of  the  dataset  is  in  the  direction  of  maximum
         and  recently  reviewed  by  Doveton  (1994).  A  bref   variation,  probably  accounting  for  80%  of  the  variation.
        description  is  given  below.                     The  second  axis  contains  the  next  amount  of  variation
           Logs  are  first  environmentally  corrected  and  given   and  so  on:  all  the  axes  are  ordered.  Principal  component
         consistent  (15  cm)  curve  sampling  rates.  Log  squaring  or   logs  can  be  derived  by  projecting  the  normalised  logs  on
         zoning  (Serra  and  Abbott,  1980),  is  then  applied  to  elim-   the  principal  component  axes  (Figure  J  1.24).  High  order
         inate  noise,  diminish  shoulder  effects  and  in  general   component  variations  are  generally  unimportant  and  are
         diminish  the  spread  of  data  and  harmonise  sensitivities  so   dropped.  Clustering  for  faciolog  is  now  applied  using  this
         that  a  log  such  as  the  MSFL  is  made  compatible  with  a   reduced  data  and  produces  a  series  of  small  clusters  or
         log  such  as  the  gamma  ray  (Figure  11.23).  A  further   local  modes  and  about  10  orginal  data  points  have  been
         harmonisation  is  necessary  to  give  the  Jogs  numerically   reduced  to  one  new  one.  However,  the  local  modes  are
         compatible  scales.  Neutron  log  values  range  from  0-80   still  too  small  to  be  interpretable  in  terms  of  lithology:
         while  the  resistivity  values  are  from  0.  1—-2000.  Re-scaling   there  are  perhaps  150  local  modes  but  less  than  20
         using  the  standard  deviation  of  a  log’s  data  spread,   Statistical  electrofacies  required.
         reduces  the  variations  to  the  same  order.     In  order  to  decide  on  the  level  of  statistical  grouping,
           Using  the  prepared  database,  the  next  stage  is  to  apply   external  data  may  now  be  consulted.  For  statistical  elec-
         a  statistical  grouping  or  clustering.  The  Schlumberger   trofacies  to  have  a  geological  meaning  they  must  be
         ‘Faciolog’  can  be  used  to  illustrate  one  approach  (Wolff   calibrated  to  a  lithology  or  lithofacies.  The  type  of  deci-
         and  Pelissier-Combescure,  1982).  Prior  to  clustering,  the   sions  required  can  be  nicely  ijlustrated  by  a  dendrogram
                                                       166
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181