Page 211 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 211

198    P r o c e s s   C o n t r o l                                                                                                                           Q u a n t i f y i n g   P r o c e s s   Va r i a t i o n    199


                                                       The effects of tampering
                                             Initial sample  After adjustment #1  After adjustment #2





                                           USL  Original variation



                                           LSL                                     Resulting variation




                                Figure 9.28  Effect of process tampering.




                                adjustments with the intent of moving the process centerline negative 3 units
                                to the intended target of 10.
                                   This situation is shown in the first two graphics (from the left) in
                                Fig. 9.28. By adjusting the process, the operator has moved the entire pro-
                                cess distribution minus 3 units. The leftmost distribution (i.e., before the
                                adjustment)  was  actually  (in  this  case)  optimally  located  between  the
                                upper and lower specifications. Two problems masked that: (1) the operator
                                had no idea where the process was located, since no control chart was
                                used to define the process distribution, and (2) the process distribution is
                                too wide for the specifications, so even though it may have been optimally
                                located before the adjustment, there was still substantial likelihood the
                                process would produce output beyond each of the specifications.
                                   The operator could only appreciate these issues if a control chart were
                                used  to  determine  its  common  cause  variation.  When  adjustments  are
                                made in the absence of a special cause, the adjustment causes additional
                                variation,  as  shown  in  the  figure.  The  minimum  amount  of  variation
                                results when the process is not adjusted. Since this process was not capa-
                                ble  of  reliably  producing  output  within  the  specifications,  100  percent
                                inspection of its output is required. In fact, any time a process is out of
                                control, or its control status is unknown, only 100 percent sampling can be
                                used.
                                   When common cause variation is treated as special cause variation,
                                and adjustments are made to the process, process tampering has occurred,
                                and process variation has increased. This can happen in any type of pro-
                                cess, including service/transactional processes.
                                   The best means of diagnosing tampering is to conduct a process capa-
                                bility study and to use a control chart to provide guidelines for adjusting
                                the process.








          09_Pyzdek_Ch09_p151-208.indd   198                                                           11/21/12   1:42 AM
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216