Page 205 - Petroleum Production Engineering, A Computer-Assisted Approach
P. 205

Guo, Boyun / Computer Assited Petroleum Production Engg 0750682701_chap13 Final Proof page 201  3.1.2007 9:07pm Compositor Name: SJoearun




                                                                                           GAS LIFT  13/201

                         Equation (13.57) indicates that the P tro also depends on  p vo1 ¼ (900) 1 þ  2,347  ¼ 953 psia
                       the optional string load S t for double-element valves. The  40,000
                       S t value can be determined on the basis of manufacturer’s  The dome pressure at the valve depth is calculated on the
                       literature.                               basis of Eq. (13.42):
                         The procedure for setting and testing valves in a shop is
                       as follows:                                  P d ¼ 0:7438(953)   0 þ (0:2562)(424 ) ¼ 817 psia
                                                                 The valve closing pressure at the valve depth is calculated
                       . Install valve in test rack.             with Eq. (13.43):
                       . Adjust spring setting until the valve opens with S t psig  P vc ¼ 817 þ (0) 0:7438ð  Þ ¼ 817 psia
                         applied pressure. This sets S t value in the valve.
                       . Pressureupthedomewithnitrogengas.Coolvalveto60 8F.  The dome pressure at 60 8F can be calculated with a trial-
                                                                 and-error method. The first estimate is given by idea gas
                       . Bleed pressure off of dome until valve opens with P tro
                         psig applied pressure.                  law:

                       Example Problem 13.7 Design gas lift valves using the  P d at 60 F ¼  520P d  ¼  (520)(817)  ¼ 725 psia
                                                                                T d  (126 þ 460)
                       following data:
                                                                 Spreadsheet programs give z 60F ¼ 0:80 at 725 psia and
                          Pay zone depth:             6,500 ft   60 8F. The same spreadsheet gives z d ¼ 0:85 at 817 psia
                          Casing size and weight:     7 in., 23 lb.  and 126 8F. Then Eq. (13.58) gives
                                3
                          Tubing 2 ⁄ 8 in., 4.7 lb. (1.995 in. ID)
                          Liquid level surface:                     P d at 60 F ¼  (520)(0:80)P d  (817) ¼ 683 psia:

                          Kill fluid gradient:        0.4 psi/ft              (126 þ 460)(0:85)
                          Gas gravity:                0.75
                          Bottom-hole temperature:    170 8F     Test rack opening pressure is given by Eq. (13.57) as
                          Temperature surface flowing:  100 8F             P tro ¼  683  þ 0 ¼ 918 psia:
                          Injection depth:            6,300 ft                  0:7438
                          Minimum tubing pressure at injection
                                                                 Following the same procedure, parameters for other valves
                           point:                     600 psi
                                                                 are calculated. The results are summarized in Table 13.5.
                          Pressure kickoff:           1,000 psi
                                                                   The spreadsheet program GasLiftValveDesign.xls can be
                          Pressure surface operating:  900 psi   used to seek solutions of similar problems.
                          Pressure of wellhead:       120 psi
                          Tubing pressure margin at surface:  200 psi
                          Casing pressure margin:     0 psi
                                                                 13.6 Special Issues in Intermittent-Flow Gas Lift
                          Valve specifications given by Example Problem 13.6  The intermittent-flow mechanism is very different from that
                                                                 of the continuous-flow gas lift. It is normally applicable in
                       Solution Design tubing pressure at surface ( p hf,d ):  either high-BHP–low PI or low-BHP–low PI reservoirs. In
                                                                 these two reservoir cases, an excessive high drawdown is
                                    120 þ 200 ¼ 320 psia
                                                                 needed, which results in a prohibitively high GLR to pro-
                       Design tubing pressure gradient (G fd ):  duce the desired quantity of oil (liquid) by continuous gas
                                                                 lift. In many instances, the reservoir simply is not capable of
                                (600   320)=6,300 ¼ 0:044 psi=ft
                                                                 giving up the desired liquid regardless of drawdown.
                       Temperature gradient (G t ):                The flow from a well using intermittent gas lift techniques
                                                                 is called ‘‘ballistic’’ or ‘‘slug’’ flow. Two major factors that
                            (170   100)=6,300 ¼ 0:011 F=ft       define the intermittent-gas lift process must be understood:
                            1   R1:0   0:2562 ¼ 0:7438           1. Complex flowing gradient of the gas lifted liquids from
                            T:E:F: ¼ R=(1   R) 0:2562=0:7438 ¼ 0:3444  the well.
                                                                 2. Contribution of the PI of the well to the actual deliver-
                       Depth of the top valve is calculated with Eq. (13.49):
                                                                   ability of liquid to the surface.
                                    1,000   0   120              Figure 13.19 shows the BHP of a well being produced by
                                D 1 ¼    1,000   0  ¼ 2,347 ft
                                    0:40                         intermittent-flow gas lift.
                                          40,000                   The BHP at the instant the valve opens is indicated by
                                                                 Point A. The pressure impulse results in an instantaneous
                       Temperature at the top valve: 100 þ (0:011) (2,347)  pressure buildup at Point B, which reaches a maximum at

                         ¼ 126 F
                         Design tubing pressure at the top valve: 320 þ (0:044)  C after the initial acceleration of the oil column.
                           (2,347) ¼ 424 psia                      Figure 13.20 shows the intermittent-flowing gradient,
                                                                 which is a summation of the gradient of gas above the
                       For constant surface opening pressure of 900 psia, the  slug, the gradient of the slug, and the gradient of the lift
                       valve opening pressure is calculated with Eq. (13.9):  gas and entrained liquids below the slug.
                            Table 13.5 Summary of Results for Example Problem 13.7
                                                    Design  Surface  Valve  Dome  Valve  Dome   Test
                                                    tubing  opening  opening  pressure  closing  pressure  rack
                            Valve  Valve  Temperature  pressure  pressure  pressure  at depth  pressure  at 60 8F  opening
                             no.  depth (ft)  (8F)   (psia)  (psia)  (psia)  (psia)  (psia)  (psia)  (psia)
                            1      2,347     126     424   900      953    817    817    683    918
                            2      3,747     142     487   900      984    857    857    707    950
                            3      5,065     156     545   900     1,014   894    894    702    944
                            4      6,300     170     600   900     1,042   929    929    708    952
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210