Page 1075 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 1075

1059

               ethyl                                          ethane                       TOPIC 11.2
                                                                                      Structure-Reactivity
                                                                                         Relationships in
                    +
                                                                   +                 Hydrogen Abstraction
                                                                                            Reactions
                          propene
                                                                           allyl
                                         Transition state
            Fig. 11.19. PM3 representation of reactants, transition state, and products showing optimal geometry
            and distribution of SOMO orbital. Reproduced from Int. Eng. Chem. Res., 40, 743 (2001), by permission
            of the American Chemical Society.


              These results extend those of an earlier study using AM1 and PM3 computations
          that showed excellent correlations within structurally similar groups, e.g., tert, sec, pri,
          and conjugated. 238  These studies also showed that the barrier for identity hydrogen
          atom transfers (e.g., ethyl/ethane) increased with conjugation. This result, which at first
          might seem surprising, reflects the fact that there is greater conjugative stabilization in
          the radicals than in the transition state. Table 11.12 lists some of the computed barriers.
          The trend toward an increased barrier with conjugation should not be confused with
          the greater reactivity of allylic and benzylic C−H toward more reactive alkyl radicals.
          For example, the data for hydrogen atom abstraction from toluene and propene by the
          methyl radical in Table 11.5 show barriers of 9.5 and 7.7 kcal/mol, respectively.
              There has been a good deal of study of the polyhalogenated methanes in hydrogen
                                                    .                   239
          atom abstraction reactions toward hydroxyl (HO ) and chlorine radicals.  These
          reactions are involved in both the atmospheric destruction of such compounds as well
          as their involvement in ozone depletion. Information is needed about these reactions
          to model the environmental impact of the compounds.
                                                        .
              The reactions of halogenated methanes with HO are characterized by a low
          activation barrier and early TS. In one study the reactants, products, and TS were
          calculated at the 6-311G(2d 2p) level using the PMP4(SDTQ) method to remove
          spin contamination. 240  Table 11.13 gives the calculated rates, E , and the derived
                                                                a
                                                                               .
          atmospheric lifetimes for the halogenated methanes based on the reaction with HO .
          The atmospheric lifetimes are computed in relation to the known rate for CH CCl .
                                                                           3
                                                                               3
                   Table 11.12. Computed Barriers for Identity Hydrogen Atom
                                    Abstraction Reactions
                          Saturated                     Conjugated
                      R             E a              R               E a

                   CH 3 ·           15.8        CH 2 =CHCH 2 ·       15.7
                   CH 3 CH 2 ·      10.1        (CH 2 =CH
 2 CH·     20.0
                    CH 3 
 2 CH·    8.3         PhCH 2 ·             15.7
                    CH 3 
 3 C·     10 9 a      Ph 2 CH·             19.3
                   a. This value is believed to be overestimated by the PM3 method.
          238
             D. M. Camioni, S. T. Autrey, T. B. Salinas, and J. A. Franz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118, 2013 (1996).
          239   R. Atkinson, Chem. Rev., 86, 69 (1986).
          240
             F. Louis, C. A. Gonzalez, R. E. Huie, and M. J. Kurylo, J. Phys. Chem. A, 105, 1599 (2001).
   1070   1071   1072   1073   1074   1075   1076   1077   1078   1079   1080