Page 764 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 764

these hydrocarbons having heteroatoms in place of one or more carbon atoms constitute  747
          another important class of organic compounds and are discussed in Section 8.6. It
          is of interest to be able predict the stability of such fused-ring compounds. Because  SECTION 8.5
          Hückel’s rule applies only to monocyclic systems, it cannot be applied to the fused-  Fused-Ring Systems
          ring compounds, but there have been many efforts to develop relationships that would
          predict their stability. The underlying concepts are the same as for monocyclic systems;
          stabilization results from a particularly favorable arrangement of MOs, whereas insta-
          bility is associated with unpaired electrons or electrons in high-energy orbitals.
              The same approximations discussed in Section 1.5 permit calculation of the
          HMO for conjugated systems of the type shown in Scheme 8.2, and many of the
          results have been tabulated. 163  However, attempts to correlate stability with the Hückel
          delocalization energy relative to isolated double bonds give poor correlation with the
          observed chemical properties of the compounds.
              Much better agreement between calculated stabilization energy and experimental
          chemical properties is achieved when a polyene is chosen as the reference state. 164
          A series of energy terms corresponding to the structural units in the reference polyene
          was established empirically by Hess and Schaad. 165  The difference between the energy
          of the conjugated hydrocarbon by HMO calculations and the sum of the appropriate
          structural units gives a stabilization energy. For azulene, for example, the HMO calcu-
          lation gives an energy of 10  + 13.36ß. The energy for the polyene reference is
          obtained by summing contributions for the component bond types: 3 CH=CH  +
          2 HC=C +3(HC−CH) + 1(C−C) = 13 13ß. The difference, 0 23ß, is the stabilization
          or resonance energy assigned to azulene by this method. For comparison of noniso-
          meric molecules, the Hess-Schaad treatment uses resonance energy per electron, which
          is obtained by dividing the calculated stabilization energy by the number of   electrons.
          Although the resulting stabilization energies are based on a rudimentary HMO calcu-
          lation, they are in good qualitative agreement with observed chemical stability. The
          stabilizations have been calculated for most of the molecules in Scheme 8.2 and are
          listed as HMO’.
              The energy parameters assigned to the reference polyene used by Hess and Schaad
          were developed on an empirical basis. Subsequently Moyano and Paniagua developed
          an alternative set of reference bond energies on a theoretical basis, 166  and these values
          are shown along with the Hess-Schaad values in Table 8.2. The stabilizations calculated
          for the various hydrocarbons using this point of reference in Scheme 8.2 are those
          listed as RE (for resonance energy). The Hess-Schaad HMO’ and the RE values are
          in generally good agreement with observed stability. Both calculations give negative
          stabilization for benzocyclobutadiene, for example. 167
              The values listed in Scheme 8.2 as SCF-MO are from an early semiempirical
          SCF calculation, which was the first instance in which a polyene was chosen as the
          reference state. 164


          163   E. Heilbronner and P. A. Straub, Hückel Molecular Orbitals, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1966;
             C. A. Coulson and A. Streitwieser, Dictionary of  -Electron Calculations, W. H. Freeman, San
             Francisco, 1965.
          164
             M. J. S. Dewar and C. de Llano, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 91, 789 (1969).
          165   B. A. Hess, Jr., and L. J. Schaad, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 93, 305, 2413 (1971); J. Org. Chem., 36, 3418
             (1971); J. Org. Chem., 37, 4179 (1972).
          166   A. Moyano and J. C. Paniagua, J. Org. Chem., 51, 2250 (1986).
          167
             There are a number of other systems for comparing the stability of conjugated cyclic compounds
             with reference polyenes. For example, see L. J. Schaad and B. A. Hess, Jr., Pure Appl. Chem., 54,
             1097 (1982); J. Aihara, Pure Appl. Chem., 54, 1115 (1982); K. Jug, J. Org. Chem., 48, 1344 (1983);
             W. Gründler, Monatsch. Chem., 114, 155 (1983).
   759   760   761   762   763   764   765   766   767   768   769