Page 769 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 769

752               The ring current in benzocyclobutadiene has been analyzed in detail. 178  The main
                       ring current is associated with the four-membered ring and is paramagnetic. This is
     CHAPTER 8
                       consistent with the calculated NICS values, which are −2 5 for the six-membered
     Aromaticity                                          179
                       ring and 22.5 for the four-membered ring.  The fusion of the cyclobutadiene ring
                       to benzene greatly diminishes the aromatic character of the benzenoid ring. The
                       implication of a nonaromatic structure is that the combination of ring strain and the
                       antiaromaticity associated with the four-membered ring results in a localized system. 180
                           Azulene is one of the few nonbenzenoid hydrocarbons that appear to have appre-
                       ciable aromatic stabilization. There is some divergence on this point between the
                       SCF-MO and HMO’ results in Scheme 8.2. The latter estimates a resonance energy
                       about half that for the isomeric naphthalene, whereas the SCF-MO method assigns
                       a resonance energy that is only about one-seventh that of naphthalene. Naphthalene
                       is thermodynamically more stable than azulene by about 38.5 kcal/mol. Molecular
                       mechanics calculations attribute about 12.5 kcal/mol of the difference to strain and
                       about 26 kcal/mol to greater resonance stabilization of naphthalene. 181  Based on heats
                       of hydrogenation, the stabilization energy of azulene is about 16 kcal/mol. 182  The
                       parent hydrocarbon and many of its derivatives are well-characterized compounds with
                       considerable stability. The structure of azulene has been determined by both X-ray
                       crystallography and electron-diffraction measurements. 183  The peripheral bond lengths
                       are in the aromatic range and show no regular alternation. The bond shared by the two
                       rings is significantly longer, indicating that it has predominantly single-bond character,
                       which indicates that the conjugated system more closely resembles [10]annulene than
                       naphthalene. Theoretical calculations indicate that the molecule has C 2v  symmetry,
                       suggesting delocalization of the   electrons. 184

                                                     1.391  1.400     1.383  1.406
                                                           1.392            1.403
                                                      1.498             1.501
                                               1.394             1.399
                                                    1.398           1.418
                                                                  electron diffraction
                                      azulene   X-ray bond lengths
                                                                  bond lengths
                       An interesting structural question involves the contribution of a dipolar structure that
                       pictures the molecule as the fusion of a cyclopentadienide anion and a cycloheptatrienyl
                       cation.

                       178   A. Soncini, R. W. A. Havenith, P. W. Fowler, L. W. Jenneskens, and E. Steiner, J. Org. Chem., 67,
                          4753 (2002); R. W. A. Havenith, F. Lugli, P. W. Fowler, and E. Steiner, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 5703
                          (2002).
                       179   P. v. R. Shleyer, C. Maerker, A. Dransfeld, H. Jiao, and N. J. R. van Eikema Hommes, J. Am. Chem.
                          Soc., 118, 6317 (1996).
                       180
                          P. B. Karadakov, J. Gerratt, D. L. Cooper, M. Raimondi, and M. Sironi, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 60,
                          545 (1996); M. O. Jensen, T. Thorsteinsson, and A. E. Hansen, Intl. J. Quantum Chem., 90, 616 (2002).
                       181   N. L. Allinger and Y. H. Yu, Pure Appl. Chem., 55, 191 (1983).
                       182
                          W. R. Roth, M. Boehm, H. W. Lennartz, and E. Vogel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 22, 1007 (1983).
                       183   A. W. Hanson, Acta Crystallogr., 19, 19 (1965); O. Bastiansen and J. L. Derissen, Acta Chem. Scand.,
                          20, 1319 (1966).
                       184
                          (a) C. Glidewell and D. Lloyd, Tetrahedron, 40, 4455 (1984); (b) R. C. Haddon and K. Raghavachari,
                          J. Am. Chem. Soc., 104, 3516 (1982); (c) S. Grimme, Chem. Phys. Lett., 201, 67 (1993); (d) S. J. Mole,
                          X. Zhou, J. G. Wardeska, and R. Liu, Spectrochim. Acta A, 52, 1211 (1996); (e) B.-C. Wang, Y.-S. Lin,
                          J.-C. Chang, and P.-Y. Wang, Can. J. Chem., 78, 224 (2000); (f) I. Bandyopadhyay, Theochem, 618,
                          59 (2002).
   764   765   766   767   768   769   770   771   772   773   774