Page 948 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 948

932                   There is a very powerful substituent effect for dienes having anionic oxygen
                       substituents at C(3), a reaction known as the anionic oxy-Cope reaction. 272  When the
     CHAPTER 10
                       C(3) hydroxyl group is converted to its alkoxide, the reaction is accelerated by factors
                                17 273
                           10
     Concerted Pericyclic  of 10 –10 .
     Reactions
                               O –                  O –            H +     O
                                                                             H



                       The rates of anionic oxy-Cope rearrangements depend on the degree of cation coordi-
                                                                               +
                                                                         +
                       nation at the oxy anion. The reactivity trend is K > Na > Li . Crown ethers
                                                                   +
                       catalyze reaction by promoting ion pair dissociation. 274  Catalytic amounts of tetra-
                       n-butylammonium salts lead to accelerated rates in some cases. This presumably
                       results from the dissociation of less reactive ion pair species promoted by the tetra-
                       n-butylammonium ion. 275  As with other [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangements, the stereo-
                       chemistry of the anionic oxy-Cope rearrangement depends on TS conformation. There
                       is no strong stereochemical preference associated with the C−O bond, and in the
                                                                             −
                       absence of other controlling steric factors, products arising from both equatorial and
                       axial orientations are formed. 276
                           The origin of the rate acceleration has been explored by computation. The
                                                                ‡
                                    ∗
                       B3LYP/6-31+G computational results give a  G of 6.3 kcal/mol, some 30 kcal/mol
                       less than the unsubstituted system. 277  Another study found the barrier to be only
                       8.3 kcal/mol in the gas phase. This is raised substantially (to 31.8 kcal/mol) by coordi-
                                    +
                       nation of an Li cation at the oxygen. 278  As shown in Figure 10.39, the TS for the
                       anionic oxy-Cope reaction is much more asynchronous than for the parent system. The
                       TS is much looser and closer to two dissociated fragments. Note that the C(3)−C(4)
                       bond has lengthened substantially in the TS, whereas the C(1)−C(6) bond distance is
                       still quite long. Several factors probably contribute to the large rate acceleration. The
                       anionic oxy substituent substantially weakens the C(3)−C(4) bond. 279  The delocal-
                       ization of the negative charge in the enolate is also likely a factor, in view of the
                       dissociative nature of the TS.
                           3-Amino groups also accelerate the Cope rearrangement. 280  The products are
                       enamines and subsequent reactions of the enamine are feasible, such as 	-alkylation.



                       272
                          L. A. Paquette, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 29, 609 (1990).
                       273
                          D. A. Evans and A. M. Golob, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 97, 4765 (1975); D. A. Evans, D. J. Baillargeon,
                          and J. V. Nelson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 2242 (1978).
                       274   J. J. Gajewski and K. R. Gee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 967 (1991).
                       275
                          M. George, T.-F. Tam, and B. Fraser-Reid, J. Org. Chem., 50, 5747 (1985).
                       276
                          L. A. Paquette and G. D. Maynard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 5018 (1992); E. Lee, Y. R. Lee, B. Moon,
                          O. Kwon, M. S. Shim, and J. S. Yun, J. Org. Chem., 59, 1444 (1994).
                       277   H. Bauman and P. Chen, Helv. Chim. Acta, 84, 124 (2001).
                       278
                          F. Haeffner, K. N. Houk, S. M. Schulze, and J. K. Lee, J. Org. Chem., 68, 2310 (2003).
                       279   (a) M. L. Steigerwald, W. A. Goddard, III, and D. A. Evans, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 1994 (1979);
                          (b) H. Y. Yoo, K. N. Houk, J. K. Lee, M.A. Scialdone, and A. I. Meyers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120, 205
                          (1998).
                       280
                          R. W. Jemison, W. D. Ollis, I. O. S. Sutherland, and J. Tannock, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1462
                          (1980); J. P. Hagen, K. D. Lewis, S. W. Lovell, P. Rossi, and A. Z. Tescan, J. Org. Chem., 60, 7471
                          (1995).
   943   944   945   946   947   948   949   950   951   952   953