Page 438 - Aircraft Stuctures for Engineering Student
P. 438

10.5 Cut-outs in wings and fuselages  419

                                     46875N









                                                       46875 N
               Fig. 10.56  Distribution of  load in the top flange of  the front spar of the wing of  Example 10.1 5.

                 The flange loads are in equilibrium with the resultants of the shear flows in the
               adjacent skin panels and spar webs. Thus, for example, in the top flange of  the
               front spar

                           P(st.4500)  = 0
                           P(st.3000) = 1500q2 - 1500q3 = 46 875 N (Compression)
                           P(~t.2250)  = 15ooq2 - 1500q3 - 750ql  = 0
               The loads along the remainder of the flange follow from antisymmetry giving the
               distribution shown in Fig. 10.56. The load distribution in the bottom flange of the
               rear spar will be identical to that shown in Fig. 10.56 while the distributions in the
               bottom flange of the front spar and the top flange of the rear spar will be reversed.
               We note that the flange loads are zero at the built-in end of  the wing (station 0).
               Generally, however, additional stresses are induced by  the warping restraint at the
               built-in end; these are investigated in Chapter 11. The loads on the wing ribs on
               either the inboard or  outboard end  of  the cut-out are found by  considering the
               shear flows in the skin panels and spar webs immediately inboard and outboard of
               the  rib.  Thus, for  the  rib  at  station 3000  we  obtain the  shear flow distribution
               shown in Fig. 10.57. The shear flows in the wing rib panels and the loads in the flanges
               and stiffeners are found as previously described in Section 10.4.
                 In Example 10.15 we implicitly assumed in the analysis that the local effects of the
               cut-out were completely dissipated within the length of  the adjoining bays which
               were equal in length to the cut-out bay. The validity of this assumption relies on
               St. Venant’s principle (Section 2.4). It may generally be assumed therefore that the
               effects of  a  cut-out are  restricted  to  spanwise lengths of  the  wing  equal to  the
               length of the cut-out on both inboard and outboard ends of the cut-out bay.





                                    1
                              46.9
                                                                      46.9
                              (9, -93)
                                                            -        I
                                                   46.9
               Fig. 10.57  Shear flows (Wmm) on wing rib at station 3000 in the wing of  Example 10.1 5.
   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443