Page 48 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 48

Evaluation of Fatigue of Fillet  Welded Joints in  Vehicle Components Under Multiaxial Service Loads  33

            To  determine  the  failure-critical element, damage calculations have  been  performed for
          each element of  the welding undercut. The critical element and corresponding fatigue lives
          have been  calculated applying three different multiaxial fatigue criteria. The first criterion -
          maximum principal stress - is very suitable to limit the failure-critical region because of  the
          short computing time. Nevertheless, it is considered that life prediction should be based on a
          critical plane criterion. In  this investigation the same two critical plane criteria already used
          for the hot spot stress approach - normal stress (mode I) and shear stress (mode II and III) -
          are applied.
            Both the principal stress and the normal stress critical plane criterion require a constant
          amplitude normal  stress-life curve. This curve is plotted in  Fig.  15 as solid line. The shear
          stress-life curve plotted as dashed line is used in connection with the shear stresscritical plane
          criterion. In all cases Miner’s rule has been applied for the damage accumulation.
























          Fig. 15. Local stress-life curves


          Local stress approach results
          Taking the load-time sequences shown in Fig. 3 into account, the damage sums are calculated
          by means of the applied software FALANCS [ 131 for each element. It is sufficient to calculate
          these damage sums for notch root elements only.
            Calculated lifetime results for all three mulitaxial criteria are listed in Table 2. The table
          contains  the  results  for  the  two  load  levels  1.0  and  1.4 for  each  of  the  load  sequences
          separately  as  well  as  the  calculated  cycles-to-failure in  the  case  of  the  nonproportional
          interaction of both sequences.
            Generally, the calculated critical position (and that is to say the critical element) depends
          on the fatigue criterion used. However, within this investigation, identical elements could be
          found as fatigue-critical for the criteria applied. This is related to the fact that one of  the two
          load cases, here bending, is dominating. The element suffering the highest stress amplitudes at
          bending is predicted as failure-critical by  any criterion, additional torsion merely adds minor
          shear stress amplitudes which are nearly constant around the weld undercut ring. We face a
          typical  situation for  multiaxial fatigue in  practice: although the  loading situation is highly
          nonproportional (and local stresses seem to resemble this) a locally predominantly uniaxial
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53