Page 218 - Defrosting for Air Source Heat Pump
P. 218

212                                         Defrosting for Air Source Heat Pump

         order changing at the period of 129–168 s. It is obvious that there was suddenly a
         decrease in Circuit 2, which resulted from the melted frost flowing onto the
         thermocouple.
            Fig. 7.16 presents the measured temperatures of the tube surface at the outdoor coil
         entrance and exit during defrosting in two cases. Clearly, with a lower outdoor coil
         exit temperature and a higher outdoor coil entrance temperature in Case 2, the
         defrosting performance was improved after the refrigerant was evenly distributed into
         each circuit. Fig. 7.17 shows the temperature difference of the outdoor coil entrance
         and exit (TDOEE) during defrosting in the two cases. The maximum values were
         42.8°C at 110 s into defrosting in Case 1, and 38.0°C at 105 s in Case 2. Obviously,
         the ΔT 2, max was smaller than the ΔT 1,max , and the former came out 5 s earlier than the
         latter. In addition, during defrosting, ΔT 2 was always lower than ΔT 1. This also
         reflects that the defrosting performance could be improved by evenly adjusting
         the refrigerant distributed into each circuit for an ASHP unit, with MFDF along
         the surface of its multicircuit outdoor coil.
            Fig. 7.18 presents the measured temperatures of the tube surface at the indoor coil
         entrance and exit during defrosting in two cases. The same as that shown in Fig. 7.16,
         with a lower indoor coil entrance temperature and a higher indoor coil exit tempera-
         ture in Case 2, the defrosting performance was improved after the refrigerant was
         evenly distributed into each circuit. From 30 to 85 s, it is a short period of fluctuation
         for the temperature curves. This is because a lot of energy was consumed on frost melt-
         ing at this period, as demonstrated in Chapter 4. However, at the same time, the energy
         transferred from the indoor air thermal energy and the compressor and air fan inputs
         could not cover this part of the energy consumption. Therefore, some of the energy
         stored in the metal of the indoor coil was taken away, and the tube surface temperature
         at its exit decreased to about  20°C, as shown in Fig. 7.18.

                     50
                            Entrance in Case 1
                            Exit in Case 1
                            Entrance in Case 2
                     40
                            Exit in Case 2
                                                T    > T
                                                 Exit, 1  Exit, 2
                     30
                    Temperature ( o C)  20




                     10
                                   T    > T
                                    Entr, 2  Entr, 1
                      0
                       0   20   40  60  80  100  120  140  160  180  200
                                           Time (s)
         Fig. 7.16 Measured temperatures of the tube surface at the outdoor coil entrance and exit during
         defrosting.
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223