Page 199 - Design of Solar Thermal Power Plants
P. 199

184         3. GENERAL DESIGN OF A SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANT

            relative error within 1 min before or after 12:45 is less than 1.2%, which is
            also at the nearly same level with the relative error under Experimental
            Condition I. It indicates that under the natural condition without exces-
            sive fluctuations and under the stable operating condition of parabolic
            trough collectors, even if the inlet temperature of heat-transfer fluid
            within the parabolic trough collector constantly increases, the dynamic
            test model for parabolic trough collector is able to show a considerable
            thermal performance prediction effect.
               For parabolic trough collector output power predicted through the
            dynamic test model and calculated based on the experimental measure-
            ment data, as shown in Fig. 3.36, their values mainly vary within a range
            of 110e130 kW. Although dynamic test model prediction curve D and
            value calculation curve M through experimental measurement within
            1 min before or after 12:45 have been obviously distinguished from each
            other, it is also the point where the maximum absolute error of predicted
            values of dynamic test model lies; however, difference between and
            among these values at the same time point has not exceeded 20 kW.
               By focusing on Experimental Condition II, comparison and error
            analysis of predicted value of thermal performance dynamic test model of
            parabolic trough collector, experimental measurement data and the
            respective calculated value have demonstrated that for the test conditions
            similar to experimental data applied in the coefficient regression of the
            model, the dynamic test model is able to achieve satisfactory thermal
            performance prediction results of parabolic trough collector.


                       130
                                                                 D
                                                                 M
                       125
                      Output Power ( kW )  120




                       115


                       110


                       105
                        12:10  12:20  12:30  12:40  12:50  13:00  13:10
                                         Time ( HH:MM )
            FIGURE 3.36  Prediction of dynamic model on collector output power under experi-
            mental condition II.
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204