Page 139 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 139

PIPES CONVEYING  FLUID: LINEAR DYNAMICS I              121

              For  a typical  pipe  used  in the  experiments  (Pai’doussis 1969,  1970) and  Q = Ion, one
              finds  (T  2 lo-’  or  less.  The  effect  of  this  is  clearly  very  small  as  compared  to,  say,
              hysteretic  damping  with  p - 6(10-2), since in  the  equation  of  motion  ,u  is  multiplied
              by     Nevertheless,  the effect of  an  artificially large  (T  on  stability as investigated by
              Pai’doussis (1963) and Gregory & Pai’doussis (1966b) is of interest; in these calculations
              the whole of the observed damping in the first and second mode of one of the pipes used
              in the experiments is assumed to be entirely due to  (T  (which, of  course, cannot be  so),
              yielding  (T  = 0.23 and (T = 1.42, respectively.* As seen in Figure 3.35, viscous damping
              with  (T  = 1.42 destabilizes the  system only for B > 0.55. With  (T = 0.23 this occurs for
              #I > 0.60, while for 0.3 < /3  < 0.6 the critical flow velocity is less than  1% higher than
              for the undamped case. The critical frequency, wCf, is reduced in almost all cases.
                The effect of  very large values of  (T  is examined by  Lottati & Kornecki (1986). Such
              large cr would  arise if  the pipe were immersed in water or a more viscous fluid (but in
              that case m, the pipe mass, must be presumed to include the fluid added mass). As shown
              in  Figure 3.36, cr is  stabilizing for  /3  5 0.5 approximately,  as in  the  foregoing,  but  for
              B = 0.8 it is destabilizing. with an interesting  ‘negative jump’ in the curve.




                                   14  -                           -I


                                   12   -


                                     -
                                2 IO           p =os


                                                                   1
                                   6k&
                                              p =O.l


                                   4
                                    0      2     4     6      8     IO
                                                    U
              Figure 3.36  The  effect of  large values  of  viscous damping, 0, on the  critical flow velocity  for
                       flutter,  ucf. of  a cantilevered pipe for various ,!l (Lottati & Kornecki  1986).

                Another interesting dynamical feature of nonconservative systems is related to the non-
              smooth variation in the critical load as damping is varied from vanishingly small to zero,
              as first discussed in general terms by Bolotin (1963). This has been studicd cxtcnsively for
              two-degree-of-freedom articulated columns [looking like the pipe system of Figure 3.1 (d)
              but  without  flow] subjected to  compressive  follower loads  (Hsmann & Bungay  1964;
              Henmann  & Jong  1965, 1966).S Such systems lose  stability either by  divergence or by

                ‘See  Sections 3.3.5  and 3.3.6.
                tThese values correspond to p = 0.065  and are computed via m = Afp and u = Azp, respectively.
                “See  also Section 2.1.5.
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144