Page 300 - Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis
P. 300

296    CHAPTER 12 A nonlocal damage-mechanics-based approach




                                   1,000,000


                                     800,000

                                                                       1T CT (expt.)
                                     600,000                           1T CT (simul.)
                                   Load (N)                            2T CT (expt.)
                                                                       2T CT (simul.)
                                     400,000                           4T CT (simul.)


                                     200,000


                                          0
                                           0      1      2     3      4      5     6
                                                           CMOD (mm)
                         FIGURE 12.9
                         Load-CMOD response of a 1T, 2T, and 4T CT specimen (experiment and FE simulation).


                         dimensionsofthe1TCTspecimens,thatis,thespecimenswerejustscaledbyafactorof
                         twoandfour,respectively.Theaim ofthisexerciseis to demonstratethatthe sameset of
                         micro-mechanical parameters should be able to satisfactorily predict the load-CMOD
                         responsesofallthesedifferentsizesofCTspecimens.TheresultsofFEanalysiswiththe
                         nonlocal model are plotted in Figure 12.9 along with the experimental data and a very
                         good agreement between the two sets can be observed.


                         6.4 EFFECT OF SYMMETRY BOUNDARY CONDITIONS ON CRACK
                         GROWTH SIMULATION
                         Often, laboratory specimens and noncomplex components are built up and loaded
                         symmetrically. For example, in the case of a CT specimen, it is sufficient to model
                         and simulate half of the specimen if the symmetric nature of the boundary conditions
                         is exploited. If the full model is analyzed instead of the half or the symmetric model,
                         the results of analysis should not change. However, it was observed that the results of
                         the local version of the Rousselier’s damage model are not only mesh-dependent, but
                         also dependent upon the choice of the boundary condition. Figure 12.10 shows the
                         load-CMOD response of the 1T CT specimen as obtained from FE analysis when
                         local model was used for the half and the full model, respectively. It can be observed
                         that the two results are different. However, the nonlocal model predicts exactly the
                         same result for both the cases. It is because of the localization of crack growth in one
                         side of the symmetry line in case of the simulation with local model as can be seen
                         from Figure 12.11. In case of FE simulation with the nonlocal damage model, mate-
                         rial damage occurs in a symmetric fashion on both sides of the line of symmetry dem-
                         onstrating that the crack grows along the center line when all the conditions for
   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305