Page 297 - Handbook of Materials Failure Analysis
P. 297

6 Results and Discussion   293





                             1400
                             1200
                            J-integral (N/mm –1 )  800
                             1000



                              600
                                                            Experiment
                              400
                                                            0.1 mm mesh (local)
                              200                           0.2 mm mesh (local)
                                                            0.4 mm mesh (local)
                                0
                                 0.0   0.5   1.0  1.5   2.0  2.5   3.0  3.5
                                                 Crack growth (mm)
                  FIGURE 12.5
                  Effect of mesh size at the crack-tip on fracture resistance (J-R curve) behavior of a 1T SEB
                  specimen (results of local damage model).

                  experiment. This is because the crack growth is very well predicted as a function of
                  applied displacement. This aspect will be clear when the fracture resistance (J-R or J
                  vs. crack growth) curve is evaluated from the area under the load-displacement curve
                  of the 1T SEB specimen with ASTM standard techniques.
                     The J-R curves obtained for different mesh sizes with the use of local damage
                  models are shown in Figure 12.5, whereas those obtained with the use of nonlocal
                  damage models are shown in Figure 12.6 along with the experimental data. It may
                  be observed that the results of the nonlocal model are mesh-independent and the
                  FE results compare very well with the experimental data. The local model predicts
                  different J-R curves for different mesh designs (i.e., mesh sizes) at the crack-tip
                  and hence, it is not suitable for the prediction of fracture resistance behavior when
                  one needs to use very fine mesh at the crack-tip in order to obtain a converged solution
                  for the stress field. On the other hand, the nonlocal model doesn’t suffer from this
                  handicap and hence, it has later been used to predict the effect of specimen geometry,
                  size, crack-depth, etc., on the load-deformation response in the upper-shelf as well as
                  the DBTT regime and the results were also compared with those of experiment in
                  order to verify the ability of the model to simulate the correct experimental response.



                  6.2 EFFECT OF CRACK DEPTH ON LOAD-DEFORMATION
                  RESPONSE OF 1T SEB SPECIMENS
                  In order to study the effect of crack-depth on load-deformation response, experiments
                  have been conducted on 1T SEB specimens with initial a/W ratios of 0.13 and 0.522,
                  respectively. The standard 1T SEB specimen has a thickness B of 25 mm thickness,
                  width W of 50 mm. The dimensions and loading conditions of the specimen are shown
   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302