Page 159 - System on Package_ Miniaturization of the Entire System
P. 159

134    Cha pte r  T h ree
































                    FIGURE 3.67  A wafer after polymer adhesive bonding. [64]



                    to wafer bonding. Wafer bonding with partially cured BCB coatings results in very
                    uniform BCB layers and prevents bonding-induced misalignment [84]. Negative
                    photoresists and polyimides can be etched in oxygen plasma. Therefore, they are
                    suitable as sacrificial bonding layers or as adhesives for temporary bonds in 3D
                    integration platforms such as for MEMS applications. Figure 3.67 shows the picture of
                    a wafer with Cu-oxide interconnect structures after bonding to a glass wafer using BCB
                    and removing the Si substrate by grinding, polishing, and wet etching [64].
                       The advantages of adhesive bonding are several and include compatibility with
                    integrated circuit wafers, relatively low bonding temperatures, the ability to join
                    practically any kind of wafer material, and a lower sensitivity of the bond strength to
                    the presence of interlayer particles. However, the downside is that the wafers are prone
                    to being misaligned during the bonding or curing process.

                    3.4.4  Different 3D Integration Technologies Using TSV
                    There are several different ways of developing a 3D integrated system using TSV
                    technology. These processes can mainly be classified in two broad categories: via-first
                    and via-last. In the via-first scheme, the TSVs are formed before the BEOL developed on
                    the carrier. In contrast, in the via-last scheme, the TSVs are formed after the development
                    of the BEOL interconnection layers. Table 3.5 shows the main process steps of these two
                    processing schemes.
                       There are variations of these two processing schemes that are followed by several
                    companies, organizations, and universities around the world. Table 3.6 provides a brief
                    overview of these different processes along with examples of some of the organizations
                    that are following them.
   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164