Page 319 - Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry
P. 319

The exo compound actually solvolyzes 5.7 times faster than the endo compound.
             Since there is no obvious route for a bond participation here, it appears that there
             must be an increase in nonbonded strain in the transition state of 87 of RT ln 5.7
             or - 1 kcal m~le-~.~O~










                  As  Sargent has  pointed  out,  experiments  and  examination  of  molecular
             models both indicate that this system should offer more extreme steric hindrance
             to endo ionization  than  the  norbornyl  system does.  One kcal  mole-l,  then,  is
             an  upper  limit  for  the  increase in  nonbonded  interaction  experienced  by  the
             leaving group  in  going  from  the  ground  to  the  transition  state  in  endo-2-nor-
             bornyl  tosylate.lo7 But  1 kcal  mole-I  cannot  be  responsible  for  the  exolendo
             ionization  rate  ratio  of  1550 reported  by  Winstein  and  Trifan,  a  ratio  since
             corroborated by hundreds of other studies.
                  More recently Nordlander and co-workers adopted a different approach to
             determine  whether  endo  ionization  of  2-norbornyl  derivatives  is  hindered.lo8
             They  solvolyzed  exo-  and  endo-2-noxbornyl  tosylate  in  the  strongly  ionizing
             but  very  weakly  nucleophilic  solvent,  trifluoroacetic  acid,  and found  the  ex01
             endo rate ratio to be  1120. They then compared the rates of solvolysis of endo-2-
             norbornyl  tosylate  and of 2-adamantyl tosylate in two solvents-trifluoroacetic
             acid  and much  more  nucleophilic  acetic  acid.  Using  an  analysis suggested by
             Schleyer,log they  reasoned  that  if  ionization  of  endo-2-norbornyl  tosylate  is
             sterically hindered, its rate should show a large dependence on the nucleophili-
             city of the solvent. But 2-adamantyl tosylate cannot solvolyze with solvent assis-
             tance  (see Section 5.4, p.  243). Thus the ratio of the rate of solvolysis of endo-2-
             norbornyl tosylate to the rate of solvolysis of 2-adamantyl tosylate should be much
             larger in  acetic acid  than  in  trifluoroacetic  acid.  In fact,  the  ratio is  30 times
             greater  in  acetic  acid  than  in  trifluoroacetic  acid.  If the rates of  solvolyses of
             trans-2-methylcyclopentyl  tosylate  (88) and 2-adamantyl  tosylate  are compared
             in  the  same  two  solvents, the  ratio of  rates is  31  times greater in acetic  acid.
             Thus endo-2-norbornyl tosylate seems to be  acting normally-that   is, like other
             secondary tosylates with a branch in the /3  position.







             loe H. C. Brown, I. Rothberg,  P. v.  R. Schleyer, M.  M. Donaldson, and J. J. Harper, Proc.  Nut.
             Acad. Sci.  U.S., 56, 1653 (1967).
             lo'  See note 59(c), p.  288.
             lo8 J. E. Nordlander, R. R. Gruetzmacher, W. J. Kelly, and S. P. Jindal, J. Amn. Chem. Soc., 96, 181
             (1974).
             \   ,
             log P. V.  R. Schleyer, J. L.  Fry, L. K. M. Lam,  and C. J. Lancelot, J. Amn. Chem. Soc.,  92, 2542
             (1970).
   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324