Page 116 -
P. 116

106   3 Optical Tweezers
                            that considers gravity, buoyancy and Brownian movement (theoretical trap-
                                                                            ax
                                                                     ax
                            pingpower is calculated usingthe expression P pre  = F pre c/n 1 Q max ).
                                                      π
                                                                 3
                                                 ax
                                               F pre  =  (ρ s − ρ m ) d g +2kT/d,         (3.21)
                                                      6
                            where ρ s and ρ m are the densities of the sample spheres and suspending
                            medium, respectively; d is the diameter of the spheres, g is the gravitational
                            acceleration, and kT is the thermal energy.
                               Results of comparison of traps between experimental and theoretical meth-
                            ods are summarized in Table 3.7 as the ratio of P ax  to P ax  . The measured
                                                                        min    pre
                            P  ax  for glass beads matches the theoretical P  ax  at large diameters (only
                             min                                      pre
                            about 1.5 times difference for the diameter of 5.8 µm) because the ray op-
                            tics model is appropriate and the Brownian effect is relatively small for large
                            diameters. In parentheses, the experimental value with the upward-directed
                            beam for the 5.8 µm diameter becomes large because the wall force (between
                            the bead and the cover slip) strongly pulls the bead downward at a small
                            distance of about 4.2(= 10 − 5.8) µm.
                               A comparison is also given for the axial trapping power in both straight ray
                            and parabolic ray approximations. Figure 3.29 shows the minimum axial trap-
                            pingpower for polystyrene microspheres comparingthe experimental measure-
                            ments to the predicted results for a straight ray model (broken line) and a
                            parabolic ray model (solid line). It is seen from the figure that the minimum
                            axial trappingpower largely increases for the parabolic ray model and is close
                            to the experimental results. This is because the actual focused trappinglaser
                            beam has a beam waist (parabolic ray model) and the individual ray enters
                            almost vertically to the sphere surface leadingto a reduced trappingefficiency.

                            3.3.3 Transverse Trapping Power
                                                               trans
                            Next, the transverse trappingpower P min  was measured as the minimum
                            power for trappinga particle movingat the constant velocity v in water, as


                            Table 3.7. Ratio of experimental and theoretical minimum axial trapping powers
                            of polystyrene sphere (a), and those of glass sphere (b)
                                   diameter (µm)downward directed         upward directed
                                   (a) Polystyrene
                                       3.25                 7.6                4.0
                                       5.85                 3.5                1.7
                                       7.73                 2.4                1.5
                                   (b) Glass
                                       1.0                  40                 50
                                       2.5                  2.5                2.2
                                       3.1                  1.9                2.0
                                       5.1                  1.8                1.7
                                       5.8                  1.5                 -
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121