Page 189 -
P. 189

5.3 Experimental Analysis  179
                              – Electromagnetic field around a near-field optical head 5,6,7
                              – Readout performance for ultrahigh density near-field recording 8,9,10


                            5.3Experimental Analysis


                            In order to observe the near field, the evanescent light scattering characteris-
                            tics of a tip probe should be understood. In this section, we first compare the
                            characteristics of different tip probes. Next we measure the evanescent field
                            intensity by detectingthe scattered light by a photocantilever, vibratingat
                            its mechanical resonant frequency, placed near the interface. Then we observe
                            the profile of a topological grating by scanning the photocantilever. At last we
                            observe the distribution of the refractive index grating and topological grat-
                                                                   +
                            ing, by detecting the scattered light of an Ar laser, by scanninga nanogold
                            particle optically trapped by a YAG laser, two-dimensionally on the surface.

                            5.3.1 Comparison of Near-Field Probes

                            When a sample is illuminated by a light the evanescent field is locally excited
                            near the surface accordingto its surface property and structure. This evanes-
                            cent field is scattered by a tip probe and then can be detected by a photodiode
                            (PD) or a photomultiplier tube (PMT). We can observe the surface by scan-
                            ningthe probe two-dimensionally on the surface. The imagingmechanism of
                            the SNOM is different from that of conventional optical microscopy; the scat-
                            tered light intensity is detected as a result of the interaction between the tip
                            probe and the sample surface. With growing understanding of the underlying
                            probe-sample interaction mechanism, SNOM has found applications in many
                            scientific and industrial fields.
                               As a typical near-field probe, a small aperture [5.3], a metallic needle
                            [5.5, 5.6], and a small metallic sphere [5.7, 5.8] are well known. The most
                            popular probe is a metal-coated sharpened optical fiber with a subwavelength
                            aperture at the end. We use this aperture to illuminate the surface and collect

                             5
                              Tanaka K, Ohkubo T, Oumi M, Mitsuoka Y, Nakajima K, Hosaka H, Itao K
                              (2001)Numerical simulation on read-out characteristics of the planar aperture-
                              mounted head with a minute scatterer. Jpn J Appl Phys 40:1542–1547
                             6
                              Mansuripur M, Zakharian AR, Moloney JV (2003)Interaction of light with sub-
                              wavelength structures. Opt Photon News:56–61
                             7
                              Kataja K, Olkkonen J, Aikio J, Howe D (2004)Readout modeling of superreso-
                              lution disks. Jpn J Appl Phys 43:4718–4723
                             8
                              Liu J, Xu B, Chong: TC (2000)Three-dimensional finite-difference-time-domain
                              analysis of optical disk storage system. Jpn J Appl Phys 39:687–692
                             9
                              Nakano T, Yamakawa Y, Tominaga J, Atoda N (2001)Near-field optical simula-
                              tion of super-RENS disks. Jpn J Appl Phys 40:1531–1535
                            10
                              Chiu KP, Lin WC, Fu YH, Tsai DP (2004)Calculation of surface plasmon effect
                              on optical disks. Jpn J Appl Phys 43:4730–4735
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194