Page 299 - Modern Control Systems
P. 299

Section 4.10  Sequential Design Example: Disk Drive Read System      273


                        Table 4.4  Response of the Boring Machine Control System
                        forK  =  20 and K  =  100
                                                      K=  20             K ~  100
                        Step  Response
                         Overshoot                    4%                 22%
                                                      1.0 s              0.7 s
                         T s
                        Disturbance  Response
                         e„                           5%                 1%


                       steady-state  response  of y(t)  to the step  disturbance. The  steady-state  value  of  y(t)
                       is 0.05 and 0.01 for  K  =  20 and  100, respectively. The steady-state  errors,  percent
                       overshoot,  and  settling  times  (2%  criteria)  are  summarized  in  Table  4.4. The
                       steady-state  values  are predicted  from  the final-value  theorem  for  a  unit  distur-
                       bance  input  as follows:

                                         lim y(t)  =  lim si  —  —  —  >—  =  —.
                                         , - « /  v  '  , - 0  [s(s  +  12)  +  KJ  s  K
                       If  our  only  design  consideration  is disturbance  rejection,  we would  prefer  to use
                       K  =  100.
                           We  have just  experienced  a very  common  trade-off  situation  in control  system
                       design. In this particular example, increasing K leads to better disturbance  rejection,
                       whereas decreasing  K leads to better performance  (that  is, less overshoot).The  final
                       decision  on how to choose  K  rests with the designer. Although  control  design  soft-
                       ware  can certainly  assist  in the control  system  design,  it  cannot  replace  the  engi-
                       neer's  decision-making  capability and intuition.
                           The  final  step in the analysis is to look  at the system  sensitivity to changes in the
                       process. The  system  sensitivity  is given by (Equation  4.60),
                                                     _    s(s  +  1)
                                                   T
                                                  S
                                                       s(s  +  12)  +  K'
                       We can compute the values of SG(S)  for different  values of.? and generate  a plot of the
                       system  sensitivity. For low frequencies, we can approximate  the system  sensitivity by
                                                             s


                       Increasing  the  gain  K  reduces  the  system  sensitivity. The  system  sensitivity  plots
                       when  s  =  jco are shown in Figure  4.33 for K  =  20.  •


      4.10  SEQUENTIAL    DESIGN   EXAMPLE: DISK    DRIVE  READ   SYSTEM

                       The  design of a disk drive  system is an exercise in compromise  and optimization. The
                       disk  drive  must  accurately  position  the head  reader  while  being  able  to reduce  the
                       effects  of parameter  changes and external shocks and vibrations. The  mechanical arm
                       and  flexure  will resonate  at frequencies  that  may be caused  by excitations  such  as a
                       shock to a notebook computer. Disturbances to the operation  of the disk drive  include
   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304