Page 268 - Modern Control of DC-Based Power Systems
P. 268

Simulation                                                   229


              hand, when selecting the ideal CPL model, the interaction between the
              generation side and load side converter is neglected, and the dynamics of
              the generation side are projected on the load. Thus, the ideal CPL model
              does not necessarily represent the worst case in terms of system stability as
              explained in [12].
                 A very interesting case shows the PI-controlled POL, which due to
              the missing derivative part is slower than the PID control; therefore, the
              load is not as tightly controlled as with the PID; in this case the Adaptive
              Backstepping controller performs very differently, this is because it uses a
              load model which differs too much from the imposed behavior.







                   6.2 SHIPBOARD POWER SYSTEM
                   A shipboard power system consists typically of many LRC in paral-
              lel which supply the common MVDC bus as depicted previously in
              Figs. 2.1 and 6.3. Prior to the simulation, it is necessary to mention
              which load sharing strategy was chosen in shipboard power systems.



              6.2.1 Load Sharing
              The strategies used in parallel converter systems for load current
              sharing can be categorized into droop control and active current shar-
              ing. Active current sharing can be either master slave or democratic
              current sharing. The main difference between the master slave and
              democratic methods is providing a variable or fixed ratio of current
              during transient and static operation [5];and thedifferencebetween
              droop and active current sharing is that droop uses r d as a virtual
              resistance for current sharing while active current sharing uses the
              voltage of the source, hence, for realizing droop the converters are
              controlled independently [4].
                 In this study, democratic current sharing is applied in synergetic
              control. While droop was used for all other stabilizing control
              methods.
                 The effect of the droop control is to create a virtual voltage drop on
              the converters output proportional to the converters output current [13],
                                                                  I
              so the controller increases or decreases the setpoint by r dk k , to maintain
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273