Page 438 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 438

416                                                 PART 4      Looking Backward and Forward


        (rebuild zone) will be penetrated more frequently. This means that there will be a steady
        stream of open supply orders. This extends a larger percentage of the buffer position to
        inbound supply. Having more open supply orders also means that the red zone base can
        be minimized. The presence of a significant MOQ often will block or challenge this green
        zone strategy owing to the inherent lumpiness caused by the MOQ.
             Two steps are necessary to determine if an MOQ is significant. First, the part’s green
        zone is calculated based on the lead-time category it falls in without consideration of
        MOQ. Second, a comparison must be made of the calculated green zone quantity and that
        MOQ. If the order minimum is greater than the size of the calculated green zone, then the
        MOQ is significant. The green zone then is sized to the MOQ.
             For example, Part XYZ has an ADU of 6 and a lead time of 20 days. It is coded a
        long-lead-time part, in which its green zone will be 30 percent of usage over lead time (36
        units). If this part has an MOQ of 48 units, this would qualify as a significant MOQ (48
        36). This designation means that the buffer profile of this part will be changed to an MOQ
        profile. Under MOQ profiles, the green zone is set to the MOQ (48 units). In this exam-
        ple, the MOQ equals 8 days of average daily usage [48 units (MOQ)/6 units (ADU)   8
        days]. Eight days, incidentally, means that the green zone will end up being sized at 40
        percent of usage over lead time.


                           Variability Category Buffer Impact
        The variability category will size the red zone safety portion of the total red zone. Early
        in development of this solution, the thinking was that red zone safety might best be
        described as a factor of ADU (e.g., 2   ADU, 3   ADU, etc.). This quickly creates a prob-
        lem for the variability factor to be managed effectively at a global level. Within a buffer
        profile there still can be relatively wide discrepancies between the discrete lead times of
        parts, especially long-lead-time parts. The same issue applies to expressing red zone safe-
        ty as a percentage of usage over lead time. The most effective heuristic is that red zone
        safety should be an expression of a percentage of the red zone base. By doing this, there
        is a smoothing effect that happens between parts that have lead-time disparities within
        the same buffer profile.
             Figure 24-13 shows how red zone safety is sized. A range is provided in order to
        allow customization to individual environments.







           FIGURE 24-13
           Red zone safety
           definition.
   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443