Page 95 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 95

1656_C02.fm  Page 75  Thursday, April 14, 2005  6:28 PM





                       Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics                                            75


                       stress, σ  = 0 by definition. Under plain strain conditions, σ  = 2νσ . Substituting these stresses
                             zz
                                                                        zz
                                                                              yy
                       into the von Mises yield criterion (Equation (2.82)) leads to the following:
                                                            σ     (plane stress )
                                              σ (at yield =   YS                                (2.87)
                                                        )
                                                yy
                                                           2.5 σ YS  (plane strain )
                       assuming ν = 0.3. Therefore, the triaxial stress state associated with plane strain leads to higher stresses
                       in the plastic zone. For fracture mechanisms that are governed by normal stress, such as cleavage in
                       metals (Section 5.2), the material will behave in a more brittle fashion when subjected to a triaxial stress
                       state. Triaxial stresses also assist ductile fracture processes such as microvoid coalescence (Section 5.1).


                       2.10.2 EFFECT OF THICKNESS ON APPARENT FRACTURE TOUGHNESS
                       Figure 2.43 and Figure 2.44 show two sets of data that have commonly been used to illustrate
                       thickness effects on fracture toughness [29]. The measured K  values decrease with specimen
                                                                          crit
                       thickness until a plateau is reached, at which point the toughness appears to be relatively insensitive
                       to further increase in thickness. This apparent asymptote in the toughness vs. thickness trend is
                       designated by the symbol K , and is referred to as “plane strain fracture toughness” [30, 31]. A
                                              Ic
                                                                                    3
                       K  value is purported to be a specimen-size–independent material property.
                        Ic
                          In the past, the decreasing trend in K  with increasing thickness in Figure 2.43 and Figure 2.44
                                                       crit
                       was attributed to a transition from plane stress to plane strain at the crack tip. Although this trend



































                       FIGURE 2.43 Variation of measured fracture toughness with specimen thickness for an unspecified alloy.
                       Adapted from Barsom and Rolfe,  Fracture  and Fatigue  Control  in Structur es. 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall,
                       Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987.

                       3  In reality, fracture toughness, as it is defined standardized K Ic  test methods, does not usually exhibit a true asymptote with
                       increasing specimen size. Refer to Section 7.2 for a detailed discussion of the K Ic  test.
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100