Page 329 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 329

METHODOLOGY     309
                               6.0
                                                            Barnett Shale
                               5.5


                              Gas production (Bcf/d)  4.5  Haynesville Shale
                               5.0





                               4.0


                               3.5


                               3.0
                             10/19/2010  11/18/2010  12/18/2010  1/17/2011   2/16/2011   3/18/2011
                                                             Date
                FIGURE 14.8  Haynesville Shale gas production surpasses Barnett Shale as the nation’s leading shale gas play (EIA, 2011b).

                                                     Create simulation input  le


                                                De ne probability density function (PDF)
                                                   for uncertain reservoir properties


                                                  Calibrate reservoir model and PDF

                                                  Perform Monte Carlo sampling with
                                                           nalized PDF

                                                                    Run reservoir simulator
                                       Run volumetric analysis          (PMT×2.0)

                                   Generate probabilistic distribution of  Generate probabilistic distribution of
                                              OGIP                         TRR

                                   Generate probabilistic distribution of  Perform economic viability analysis
                                               RF                 (ERR/TRR vs gas price etc.)
                                        FIGURE 14.9  Flow chart used in Dong et al. (2013) study.
            14.2  METHODOLOGY                                      In the study, they applied UGRAS to generate gas produc-
                                                                 tion profiles for a variety of reservoir, well, and hydraulic frac-
            Shale gas reservoirs are highly heterogeneous, and the well   ture scenarios. Thousands of simulations were run automatically
            productivity depends on reservoir properties as well as com-  to explore combinations of unknown reservoir and well param-
            pletion and stimulation parameters. Even if finite difference   eters across their ranges of uncertainty. They used the investment
            reservoir simulators are available, it can be time‐consuming to   evaluation hurdles IRR >20% and payout time <5 years, applied
            do a large reservoir simulation study. Dong et al. (2013) devel-  on an individual‐well basis, to determine the fraction of TRR
            oped a computer program, Unconventional Gas Resource   that is ERR for a variety of economic situations. They assumed
            Assessment  System (UGRAS)  to determine  the values of   that if a well does not pay out in 5 years, it is probably not worth
            ERRs. In the program, they integrated Monte Carlo simula-  drilling at this time. There should be other places to drill and
            tion with an analytical reservoir simulator, PMTx 2.0, to   spend capital that are more profitable.
            estimate the original volume in place, predict production   The workflow of the study with the probabilistic reser-
            performance, and estimate the fractions of  TRR that are   voir model UGRAS is outlined in Figure  14.9. First, an
            ERRs for a variety of economic situations.           input file is created and uncertain parameters are assigned
   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334